Paranormal conferences have become quite popular over the last decade, with events popping up all over the United States (and I’ve seen more over in the UK). Although most are intended to bring enthusiasts together, such as with comic cons, there are a few that have an additional purpose; raising money for a good cause. Sometimes the donations go towards the restoration efforts of a historical location, while other times the goal is to help a family that has fallen on hard times due to cancer or other illnesses.
One such event that I enjoy attending is the Gettysburg Battlefield Bash, which was held July 26 to Jul 28 at the Wyndham hotel in Gettysburg, Pa. The event is organized by Pamela and Steve Barry, with Pamela being the owner of the Gettysburg Ghost Exchange store (also in Gettysburg). Proceeds from the event benefit two very important charities; the Pennsylvania Wounded Warriors, Inc. and Heroes 4 Higher. The PAWW is an independent statewide non-profit 501(c)(3) organization providing support to Pennsylvania Wounded Warriors, veterans in crisis, and their families. Heroes 4 Higher, run by John Buckland, is also a certified 501(c)(3) non-profit outreach foundation that offer last wish Batmobile rides for terminally ill kids, financial assistance for families in crisis, and much more.
There was one additional benefit unveiled
at this year’s event; the Tribute car. The vehicle, a 2014 Chevy Equinox, was
purchased by Steve Barry to offer free rides to the hospital for young cancer
patients and veterans who would otherwise have difficulty affording
transportation or not being able to make appointments at all (Hauler 2019).
Steve had the idea of creating a vehicle that would bring a smile to kid’s (and
veteran’s) faces when it arrived to pick them up. And the community agreed; local
businesses came forward to donate things like paint, wheels, and airbrush work
to create an amazing vehicle that kids and adult ‘inner kids’ could geek out
about.
The Tribute Car – featuring superheroes, veterans, and kids lost to cancer
This was the third year of “The
Bash” (as it is affectionately known) and plans are well under way for the 2020
event. The Barrys have put a lot of time, effort, and their own money into
organizing this event each year, all without making a dime for themselves. The Barrys
are good people and it takes only a few moments of conversation to feel the
passion they have for being able to offer help to both veterans and kids. That
passion was evident in a video posted to Facebook on August 21, where Pamela
read a letter from Helen Sajer, president of the PA Wounded Warriors, that stated
the donations from the Bash had already helped one hundred and eighty veterans
in July alone.
With any major event like this, there
are bound to be a few people that cause disruptions. For example, a vendor that
has prior issues with the organizers was removed from the conference due to posting
a threatening video on social media, indicating that ‘something’ was going to
happen at the event the next day. After being informed by a guest, hotel management
became justifiably concerned and worked with the organizers to refund the
vendor’s money and escort her off the premises. I happened to be standing
nearby and witnessed the experience.
Sadly, the disruptions do not end
when the conference is over, and everyone has gone home. Recently, a tabloid-style
website, The Paranormal Herald, has posted unsupported allegations against Pam
and Steve Barry. In an article entitled “Pam and Steve Barry owners of
Gettysburg Bash, under investigation for fraud and miss usage of charitable
funds,” author Evan Jensen alleges the couple pocketed the money raised for
veterans and terminally ill children (Evans 2019). This isn’t just someone expressing
a negative opinion about a bad experience; that headline boldly states the couple
is ‘under investigation’, insinuating a criminal investigation is in progress.
Spoiler warning – there isn’t. The
‘article’ is fabricated bullshit.
Normally I ignore the rantings of
Evan Jensen. His awful grammar and spelling make his tabloid-style writing difficult
to read. Getting past that, he consistently fails to provide sources for his
allegations and/or relies heavily on anecdotes. Once he’s stirred the pot, he seems
to relish in the attention, shifting his role to immediately play the victim.
He twists the words of others into ‘death threats’ and embellishes anecdotes in
favor of his agenda. I’ve been the subject of Jensen’s rants before, so I’m no
stranger to his “reporting” style, which lacks basic investigation skills.
When I host workshops or present
lectures on investigating mysteries, the first step I talk about (and use
myself) is understanding the person making the claim. This is important to establish,
giving us a better idea as to the credibility of the claimant; are they sincere
or do they have a track record of ‘crying wolf’. In the past, Jensen has made
statements that he was an ex-Navy Seal. Although he was enlisted in the Navy,
it appears he embellished his training. According to the website “This Ain’t
Hell”, a well-known blog for investigating valor vultures and verifying the
legitimate service of honorable veterans, the ‘Navy Seal’ claim was a false embellishment.
An author for the blog obtained copies of Jensen’s DD214 discharge records,
showing that Jensen “had 27 months of service as a fireman, six months on the
USS Midway at sea and then for some reason, he was out on the street with an
abbreviated career in the Navy ending his time as an E-1. No SEAL training, no
awards of any kind”. (Lilyea 2017). According to the website, Stars and
Stripes, “Stolen Valor” is a term applied to the phenomenon of people falsely
claiming military awards or badges they did not earn, service they did not
perform, Prisoner of War experiences that never happened, and other tales of
military derring-do that exist only in their minds” (Ruyle 2010). This gives
you a good idea of Jensen’s credibility.
I contacted Pam and Steve Barry
and scheduled a meeting to discuss the allegations made against them. On a beautiful
Saturday afternoon, I drove out to Gettysburg and walked into their shop. As I
made eye contact with Pam, tears streamed down her face – it was heart-breaking
to say the least and I couldn’t help but give her a big hug. In full disclosure,
I have been friends with both Pam and Steve for several years. With that said,
I also made it clear to them that I was there to investigate the allegations
objectively; I was going to ask hard and/or awkward questions and report what I
found or didn’t find. Pam and Steve were completely cooperative and allowed me
access to everything.
We went over the allegations one
at a time, literally line by line. They shared documents, licenses, permits,
approvals, receipts, and anything else I requested. Over the next several days,
I was in contact with them with dozens of follow-up questions. The results of my
inquiries are below, along with the documentation I am permitted to publish. Be
advised that the absence of some documentation does not indicate it does not
exist or ‘reveals information that would expose anyone’. Unless otherwise
stated, the absence of documentation is due to the legal proceedings currently
engaged.
I’m going to list the allegations
Jensen made, quoting directly from his blog. This means all his poor grammar/spelling
will be included (I’m not fixing his crap). I’ll then address each one with information
I gathered from primary sources. References, something Jensen seems completely
oblivious to, are provided at the end of the article (like they’re supposed to
be). This includes a link to the full blog post this article is based on. All
quoted materials are used under Fair Use section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976.
This might get a bit long, so you
might want to visit the restroom before proceeding.
1 – Steve Barry, is saying he is an X-ray person that can read cancer x-rays. False. Steve was trained as an x-ray processor service technician. He received training from Kodak, Fuji, Alphatek, and Konica. He was trained to look at mammograms to determine whether artifacts were image quality issues caused by the machine. Steve looked for image quality issues; he never claimed to ‘read cancer x-rays’ and/or diagnose them, which is a job reserved for the radiologist and your doctor. (Krans 2016).
2 – They have been accused of raking in the money, but not delivering the said profits to the charitable organization, they promised it would go to. False. First of all, who – exactly – made this accusation. I do have some leads, but I need to dig a little deeper into them for now. Second, where is Jensen’s supporting evidence? These are the most basic questions that should be addressed before printing/posting any accusations. Jensen failed to do this (he usually does). This is not really surprising, since the actual documentation I reviewed states exactly the opposite of what he claims. Helen Sajer, president of the PA Wounded Warriors, Inc., sent a letter confirming and thanking the Barrys for their generous donation the Gettysburg Battlefield Bash made possible – which had already helped one hundred and eighty Pennsylvania veterans and their families. This letter appeared and was read in a streaming video that can still be viewed on Pamela Barry’s Facebook page (Barry 2019). During my meeting with the Barrys, I was given access to the letter and verified its authenticity.
Likewise, John Buckland, the
president of Heros 4 Higher, posted to their own Facebook page the following on
August 30; “H4H Foundation would like to take the time to publicly thank Steve
& Pam Barry for the kind donation that was recently received from the last
Gettysburg Battlefield Bash.” (Buckland 2019).
These are the two major charity
organizations the Gettysburg Battlefield Bash benefited, through the attendees,
vendors, and volunteers – for the second year in a row (for both charities). I’m
as confident in the following statement as any statement I’ve made in my life;
If these two charities had not received the pledged donations, they would not
have returned to the event for a second time (in person, I have pictures), they
would not have been on board for next year, they would not have sent letters of
Thank You for the donations, or publicly thanked the Bash for the donations
they received. Honestly, to think otherwise makes you an idiot – plain and
simple.
3 – No respective insurance and/or permits have been found or reported in searching out such to host such events in the Gettysburg Ghost Exchange’s or Historic Lookout House’s name. False. The event was sponsored by Gettysburg Battlefield Bash, c/o Steve Barry and was granted approval (unanimously) by the Zoning Board of Straban Township, Adams County on April 16, 2019 – with a written decision on May 29, 2019 (which I have a copy of). A copy of the written decision was sent via first-class mail and email to Barry’s attorney – Puhl, Eastman & Thrasher, located in Gettysburg, Pa.
4 – They’ve opened the property, which is zoned as residential, to host weddings and other events. clearly it is A business then. Duh. The author doesn’t specify what property he is referring to here; the writing style is less than clear and is quite confusing at times. However, I would assume he is referring to Historic Lookout House, since the business license for the Gettysburg Ghost Exchange is hanging up in the shop – in full view of anyone visiting. The license for the Lookout House is also prominently displayed, as required by the PA Department of Revenue. Opening one’s home to such events does not always require commercial zoning, so one would need to check with local zoning commission for details. The license that was displayed verifies the owners went through the proper channels.
5 – No true licenses have been found and no documents, that support A non profit company exists. Under there [sic] names again no records have been sourced. Duh. Neither Steve nor Pam have claimed to be a non-profit organization. This seems to be a fabrication included simply to have something Jensen can pretend to expose.
6 – It has been stated Steve is on disability and that his wife earns some 700 A month at the bed and breakfast, but it is been duly noted, that they have profited from side businesses Yes, Steve is on disability. He has had four back surgeries. He has rods in his lower back and a plate in his neck. He suffered a full cardiac arrest and actually died and was brought back after receiving fifty-three shocks from a defibrillator. In addition, he also had two heart ablations due to a heart arrhythmia. Steve currently has a Watchman device implant – which is a permanent heart implant that effectively reduces the risk of stroke—without the risk of bleeding that can come with the long-term use of warfarin (Boston Scientific Corporation 2019) – and is currently part of a study on the effectiveness of stopping blood clots. So, yeah…the man is certainly allowed to be on disability. In addition, Steve is not a business partner of the Gettysburg Ghost Exchange or the Lookout House, therefore he has nothing to do with what either place profits from or doesn’t profit from.
As for the “$700 a month at the
bed and breakfast” claim: first – Jensen provides no source for this number (or
any claims, for that matter), and therefore we must question the validity of
his statement. Second, the Lookout House has a Pennsylvania license form the
Department of Revenue, issued for ‘The Historic Lookout House’ that clearly states,
“This license authorizes the holder to collect state and/or local sale, use and
hotel occupancy tax.” Depending on the (US) state, locations registered with
AirBnB are not required to be zoned for commercial use. A third point to
consider, and it’s an important one; the Historic Lookout House is not
advertised as a Bed & Breakfast. You can rent a room, rent the whole house,
or hold an event there – but they don’t provide a cooked breakfast. This is
kind of important, being that ‘breakfast’ is half of that title.
7 – “and have bought A few recent vehicles even using said donations for such. On another note and apparent limo was recently purchased.” False. There are two vehicles being referenced here; the Tribute car, which is a 2014 Chevy Equinox and a 2001 Cadillac Deville limo. The Equinox was purchased by Steve Barry, with his own money, long before the Bash took place. He pulled up the loan and payment records for me to review and I found no evidence to suggest that donations were used to purchase the vehicle. The eighteen-year-old Cadillac Deville was acquired through bartering. Steve had two pickups, one of which was bartered for a motorcycle. The motorcycle was sold (due to his back issues) and the money from the that sale was used to purchase the Deville. The original idea was to use the limo for the Tribute car, but the cost of needed repairs and the cost of insurance was too high (an additional permit for Interstate highway use was also an added expense).
8 – According to A said interview on Good Morning America, they claim to be using the vehicle solely to transport sick children with. False. The Good Morning America interview is listed in the references below and is available for anyone to view. Nowhere in the written article or the slideshow on that page claims the vehicle will be used “solely to transport sick children. What it does say is “Pamela and Steve Barry bought a new car to help young cancer patients and veterans get free rides to the hospital.” (Hauler 2019). That’s what they are offering, but the car can be used for other things, after all…it was purchased by Steve and belongs to him. I think what he’s doing with the vehicle is amazing, and really speaks volumes as to the heart and character of the Barrys.
9 – On A few pages, we had seen the group state for the record, that all proceeds will go to Wounded Warriors program of P.A. False. In all the postings detailing the purpose the Gettysburg Battlefield Bash, it is clearly stated that the event “benefits the Pennsylvania Wounded Warriors and Children with Cancer” (GBB 2019). This does not state, nor does it mean, that 100% of the proceeds was going to a single charity. The proceeds (money obtained from an event or activity) were split between two major charities, not just one. In addition, there are costs involved with organizing an event like this, see the next question for more on that.
10 – In 2019, the Gettysburg Battlefield Bash was again held on the 26th through the 28th of July, at the Gettysburg Wyndham at no cost. False. There are lots of costs involved with organizing an event; permits, signage, permits for the signage, event insurance, shirts, trophies for the advertised activities, donations to the tribute trucks, rooms for special guests, all taxes, stuffed toys for kids, electricity supply for vendors and entertainment, zoning applications and fees. material to block access to sections of the parking lot, wrist bands for attendees, and paid talent such as the DJ. It is no small expense to host such a large event.
11 – Volunteers were now classified as “employees” and posting on social media as such when they were formally considered “volunteers” “Volunteer Coordinator”. False.The staff of the Gettysburg Battlefield Bash is all volunteers. There are no employees or paid volunteers (which wouldn’t be volunteers). Volunteers donate their time and do not expect nor receive any compensation. They donate their time because love the causes the event benefits.
I brought up this matter with Pam
and Steve first, who confirmed everyone had volunteered. I then contacted two of the volunteers; Erik
Julian and Cara Davidson. Julian is the volunteer coordinator and has overseen
the volunteers since the first Bash event. When I asked him if he has ever been
paid or considered an employee, he replied, “Absolutely not. None of our
volunteers expect payment because we are all volunteering.” Cara Davidson works
the entrance booth, collecting the entrance fee and giving out wrist bands. When
asked the same question, Davidson stated “at no point was I called, or did I
infer an employee status” nor was she paid any compensation. She donates her
time to be with friends and participate in something that will help multiple
other individuals.
These people volunteered their
time for a great cause and were happy to do so. This claim of volunteers being classified
as ‘employees’ seems to have originated with an estranged relative rather than by
any supporting documentation.
12 – “The Bash again produced a draw in the way of attendees well above 1000; again, no financial statements were released, no receipts given, and NO release of funds generated for the charities made known. According to the IRS under Exempt Organization Public Disclosure and Availability Requirements, “Tax-exempt organizations must make annual returns and exemption applications filed with the IRS available for public inspection and copying upon request. In addition, the IRS makes these documents available” (IRS 2019). The annual returns form (Form 990) doesn’t require individual donors and donation amounts to be recorded. In addition, “With the exception of private foundations, an exempt organization is not required to disclose the name and address of any contributor to the organization” (IRS 2019). And finally, the IRS does not require most nonprofits to tell you where their donations come from. The exceptions are donors to private foundations and political organizations (Candid 2019).
The bottom line here is that the “financial
statements, receipts, and release of funds” Jensen believes should have been
disclosed to the public, are not required to be.
13 – As per the requirements that are laid out in the PA Attorney General’s Charitable Trusts and Organization, policy it states, “Each contribution in the control or custody of the professional solicitor shall in its entirety and within five days of its receipt be deposited, maintained and administered in an account at a bank or other Federally insured financial institution which shall be in the name of the charitable organization and over which that charitable organization shall have sole control of all withdrawals.” This is policy quote is from The Solicitation of Funds for Charitable Purposes Act, 10 P.S. § 162.1 et seq., Act 202 of 1990 (last amended and effective February 20, 2018) under section § 162.9. Registration of professional solicitors; contract and disclosure requirements; bonds; records; books (Pa.gov 2018). This policy pertains to the charitable organization, which would be both the PA Wounded Warriors, Inc. and the Heroes 4 Higher Foundation. Both organizations publicly acknowledged receiving donations and there is no reason (or evidence) to suggest they anything less than following the rules. I’m assuming Jensen is trying to link this policy quote with the lack of statements he complained about in the claim above (#12) – which we’ve established were not required to be disclosed to the public, despite Jensen’s complaints and an individual posting such questions on the PAWW Facebook page (yup, I saw that).
14 – “Tribute Car Donations Known & Known Funds Raised Known Donations.” “Known”? If I may quote one of the most famous lines from Inigo Montoya, “You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.”
The first thing that should be
recognized is that in the paragraph above the “known figures” Jensen gives, he
clearly states “no financial statements were released, no receipts given, and
NO release of funds generated” (as addressed in #12 above) – making it obvious he
has no sources for the numbers he provided. In addition, as mentioned
previously, there are no citations or references provided anywhere in his blog
post. Based on the available information, it seems that Jensen fabricated these
numbers out of whole cloth.
Jensen lists the number of bikers
for the rally at 150 participants at $20 each, for a total of $3,000. I attended
the event and spent a good deal of time taking photos of everything going on.
This included the motorcycles that were participating, along with the riders
from the Combat Vets Association. Below is one of the images I captured,
showing all the motorcycles lined up; there are twenty-nine bikes. That’s a bit
short of the 150 Jensen claims.
Jensen also present cash number
donations from various business, such as Kenny’s Auto Paint and Materials –
which doesn’t exist. (Way to fact check, dumbass). Other businesses donated
work, time, and materials – not cash. Jensen also changes his fabricated total
amount from three years; starting at $89K, then down to $86K, then back to “89thousand”
– all with absolutely no documentation (which is typical).
15 – The Disclaimers His current version includes a classic line; “The Paranormal Herald: Makes no warranties or representations whatsoever regarding the quality, content, completeness, suitability, adequacy, sequence, accuracy, or timeliness of such information and data.” (Jensen 2019). This is not only a joke, but clearly puts this rubbish firmly in the category of “supermarket tabloid trash”. He’s telling you that he can make up any bullshit he wants without any proof, fully expecting not to be held accountable.
The original version of his disclaimer
went like this, “The allegations being made are simply that allegations, that
have been brought forth. The Paranormal Herald, has reported its findings and
if found to be unwarranted, will remove them upon such finding. All allegations
brought forth, are to be considered, as just that, until proven guilty” (Jensen
2019). – This gibberish, combined with the trash from the newer version, won’t
protect him from possible legal actions. According to HG.org Legal Resources, “The
First Amendment does not protect individuals from facing civil penalties if
they defame another person through written or verbal communication. The First
Amendment also does not provide protection for forms of speech that are used to
commit a crime, such as perjury, extortion or harassment.” (HG.org 2019). In
all seriousness, I hope civil action is taken against him.
In Closing…
I want to stress to everyone reading this that Jensen fails to provide any sources, thus his allegations are baseless and cannot be taken seriously. The burden of proof falls squarely on his shoulders and no one else; he needs to provide proof of his accusations. Constantly claiming that “others” have made these allegations doesn’t mean a damn thing. It all falls onto him and I have no doubt that if legal action is taken against him…he’ll squeal the names of who fed him this tall tale.
I also want to point out a specific line in his disclaimer; “If misleading, inaccurate or otherwise inappropriate information is brought to our attention, a reasonable effort will be made to fix or remove it.” I think we’ve shown that Jensen relied on and published nothing but misleading, inaccurate AND otherwise inappropriate information. So I ask, will he keep his word and remove it? I doubt it. My advice to everyone; ignore Jensen and his posts. Don’t give him the attention he craves.
Pam and Steve Barry are trying to
make a difference in the lives of our veterans and terminally ill kids. They
are giving everything they possibly can of themselves; giving up their time, performing
all the necessary steps, and following all the rules. They sacrifice for those
that have sacrificed so much already. They were (and probably still are)
concerned that this tabloid-trash blog post (and the additional ‘follow-ups’
since) would affect the attitude of veterans and families; I don’t see this happening.
There are so many people that know Pam & Steve, knowing how much heart and
soul they put into these events. I’ve seen a veteran break down in tears after
Steve assured the gentleman, he would be taken to appointments that, sadly, the
veteran usually missed because of no transportation. The Barrys are indeed
affecting the people around them, making a positive difference in the lives of
our veterans and kids.
The next Gettysburg
Battlefield Bash will be July 24 to 26, 2020 at the Wyndham Gettysburg Hotel.
Once again, the event will be benefiting Pennsylvania Wounded Warrior and
Heroes 4 Higher (for the third year in a row!) If you would like to participate,
volunteer, or attend, please contact Pamela & Steve Barry, please contact
them at 717-420-5791 or 717-521-7465. You can also email them at – GettysburgBB@gmail.com
Hey there! I’m conducting a survey of paranormal groups/individuals and how they approach certain aspects of an investigation, geared towards ghost hunting-types. The purpose of collecting this data is to obtain a better understanding of how and why specific things are done. Hopefully, a better understanding will lead to improvements in procedures and our way of thinking.
I’m really not sure how long it will take to complete, but I’m guessing around 20 to 40 minutes depending on how much detail is included. Once the survey is completed, the accumulated data/results will be shared with all participants, as well as online for the public (minus names/contact info). Please share this page with your paranormal friends and colleagues, then more participants we have the better the data. Special thanks to Tim Vickers and Dave Schumacher.
When you’re ready, please copy and paste the text below (from ‘Date” to question #15) onto a Word document or email, fill in your responses, and email it to me at the following address – Parainvestigator@comcast.net – with the Subject: Paranormal Survey. I plan on keeping the survey open for several months, which will allow us to collect as many responses as possible. This is not a ‘test’, no one is going to be graded or judged, and there is no right/wrong answers; we’re just looking at data. So please, don’t feel any pressure, just answer the questions honestly.
Thank you for you time and participation.
Date: Team/Individual Name – Contact Information:
1a – How often does your team take measurements in order to establish a baseline? If so, how often? Every Investigation Private Investigations Only Public Investigations Only It’s atRandom Times.
1b – How much time is spent gathering baseline readings/information for each investigation?
1c – What type of readings are you collecting for baseline readings, and why?
2 – Are controls are in place to guard against data contamination during any of the following (Please explain the controls);
A – EVP/Ghost Box Sessions:
B – Video system (DVR) setup and monitoring:
C – Use of devices such as Rem Pods/Parasocpes:
3 – Do you compile the data collected from each investigation and make comparisons to previous site visits and/or other locations? (For example, do you keep a spreadsheet?)
4 – Is your data published anywhere that is accessible to interested parties? If so, can you provide a link/location?
5 – Do you publish negative results (no readings/experiences/anything) along with results deemed positive?
6 – Do you consult professionals from various related fields of study and include their assessment in your results? If so, what have been some professions you’ve used consultants for?
7 – Have you tested your equipment in controlled environments to determine what can and cannot affect them, other than what is considered ‘paranormal’? What type of testing have you done? (Provide example(s), please)
8 -Do you use EMF meters in the course of investigations? If so, why?
9 – Do you use Rem Pods/Electronic Trigger objects in the course of investigations? If so, why?
10 – Do you use Static Detectors during the course of your investigations? If so, why?
11 – Does your group conduct historical research on the location prior to visiting the location or afterwards? Is there a specific reason for your choice?
12 – For photographic and video anomalies, what is your procedure for determining if an anomaly is paranormal?
13 – For audio recordings, what is your procedure for determining whether a sound/noise is Electronic Voice Phenomenon (from ghosts)?
14 – In your opinion, what is the most reliable tool/device for paranormal investigation – and why?
15 – In your opinion, what is the most compelling form of evidence for paranormal activity – and why?
The television show, “My Ghost Story; Caught on Camera”, which airs new episodes on the Bio network on Saturdays at 10/9c, is about alleged haunted locations and the ghostly stories associated with them. As it says on the website, “My Ghost Story” features true and astonishing stories of the paranormal, told by the people who lived through them” (Biography.com 2013). The validity of these stories should not be taken at face-value, even though the experiences are expected to be.
I had heard of the show before and had caught a few minutes here and there while channel surfing. Honestly, a few minutes was quite enough – in my opinion, the producers seem to love images of dust particles, long exposures and the sound of garbled noises mistaken as “clear” voices of spirits. They showcase people that make it clear they have little to no knowledge in photography whatsoever. A recent episode, which we’ll get to in a moment, prompted me to watch full episodes of this show, in order to get a better idea of what they present to the public (as opposed to just a few minutes here and there). Sure enough, orbs, fuzzy images and horrible audio recordings are the norm, as well as assumptions, misinterpretations and bad “science”.
So, what prompted me to endure the self-imposed torture of episode after episode? The My Ghost Story show visited a place I know quite well – Fort Mifflin in Philadelphia, Pa. I was tagged in a Facebook post that called attention to the episode in question, “Fear and Loathing in Fort Mifflin“. I was quite upset about how the show presented the history of the Fort and how it related to the ghost stories featured on the show (Biography.com 2013, episode 54).
The segment follows Denise Mallet – President, Founder and Lead Investigator of the South Philadelphia Paranormal Investigators (SPPI 2013) – as she (and her team) walk around Fort Mifflin in a reenactment of what they consider an investigation. Interspersed throughout are interview-style sections where Denise tells her version of the history of the fort, as well as describing her spooky experiences and how they’re tied together.
After watching the segment on Fort Mifflin, I was a bit confused …which later turned into frustration (which leads to this little gem you’re reading). Of all the “history” Ms. Mallet related, there was barely a shred of accuracy to any of it. Paranormal television programs have never been a reliable source of information, but I must admit that I was surprised by the total lack of fact-checking by the My Ghost Story crew. As far as I could tell, there wasn’t any fact-checking done whatsoever. This was not something I could simply “let go”. So, I contacted Lorraine Donahue-Irby, Office Manager & Book Keeper for Fort Mifflin, who was extremely upset at the how the show presented the history of the Fort. I arranged to meet with her the following weekend.
On a cold Sunday afternoon, I arrived at the fort and was greeted by a smile and a hug from Lorraine (we’ve been friends for several years). She had some work to finish up, so I used the extra time to locate the specific areas showcased on My Ghost Story, where Ms. Mellet had claimed to have captured photographic evidence of paranormal activity – we’ll get to that in a few moments.
After about an hour, I sat down with Lorraine and we discussed everything that was presented on the show. Lorraine not only provided the necessary information to set the record straight, but she allowed me access to historical documents within the Fort Mifflin archives. We discussed historical events and people in great detail while reviewing Records of Internment and court documents associated with the Fort.
In about an hour, I had verified much of the actual history of the Fort. Armed with knowledge and documentation from the Fort Archives (the best source for verifying the historical events associated with the ghostly stories at the Fort), I was just about ready to write about correcting the inaccuracies set forth by the episode of My Ghost Story. Additional research had to be done – from searching the archives of the Library of Congress to references from a regional book relating the “paranormal history” of the Fort (which, to my knowledge, is the only accurate retelling of the history). There are quite a few YouTube videos and a few local “ghost story” books that most likely set the stage for this most recent misrepresentation of history, all of which seem to be recycling the same false history, over and over. It’s not hard to imagine where Ms. Mellet got her information from – but it most certainly did not from Fort Mifflin.
Moving forward, we’re going to take a look at ten specific issues featured in the episode of My Ghost Story. We’ll be going over them as they were unveiled during the segment. I’ll begin each section with a quote taken directly from the segment and then go on to explain what is incorrect, followed by the documented history. So, let’s get started.
1 – “William H. Howe was hung for Treason, for Desertion and the murder of many men in 1864.”
While it is indeed true that William Henry Howe was hung in 1864, we must be clear that he was hung for Desertion and the Murder of one man, not “many men” as is stated by Ms. Mellet. According to the US Civil War Draft Registrations Records dated June 1863, William was noted as “Deserter, & Murderer of the Enrolling Officer”. (Ancestry.com 2013) Treason, which is defined as “the offense of acting to overthrow one’s government or to harm or kill its sovereign” (Dictionary.com 2013) was NEVER a charge against this man. There is absolutely no documentation anywhere that would suggest William had been charged with Treason. There were only two charges documented in the court records – Desertion & Murder. He was not a traitor.
The charge of Desertion is not what you think it is, and I’ll explain. William enrolled in the army on August 8, 1862, and became member of Company A of the 116th Pa Regiment – also known as the Irish Brigade. According to the Philadelphia Inquirer, “he stood very high in the estimation of his officers.” (Philadelphia Inquirer 1864) The same paper reports that “He was particularly spoken of at the Battle of Fredericksburg, as he was one of the five men who came off the field of carnage with the colors of his regiment”. He was a war hero. What many don’t know is…he was also suffering.
After the battle, Howe was suffering from Inflammation of the Bowels – a condition that causes abdominal cramps and pain, bloody diarrhea, severe urgency to have a bowel movement, fever, Loss of appetite, aeight loss, and anemia (eMedicinehealth.com 2013). With the regimental hospital having burned down, Howe, along with around 20 others, reported to hospitals in Washington (Philadelphia Inquirer 1864). Unfortunately, there were already too many injured already at this hospital, and there was little relief to be found ( Selletti 2008). So, William, along with his friend Agustus Beiting, returned to their homes – William residing in Perkiomensville, Pa. – where he was confined to bed for two months (Philadelphia Inquirer 1864). The man was not a coward in the face of the enemy, he was suffering from a horrible condition where he was reportedly having fortyto sixty bowel movements a day, and nothing could provide any relief.
The “murder” of one man, and only one man, occurred late on the night of June 7th, 1863. I placed the word Murder in quotes because that describes the intentional taking of another human life, and this was simply not the case. According to the report in the Philadelphia Inquirer, the night was dark and rain was falling hard. Abraham Bartolet, the enrolling officer for Howe’s district, had gone to the house with three assistants and called out for Howe. Howe’s wife was already in bed (indicating the hour was late), and went to the window, asking “Who is there, and who do you want?” Bartolet replied “It is I, Agustus Beiting, tell Bill to run…”. Howe came to the window, and Bartolet said they were there to arrest him, as the men began hammering on the door. Howe fired two shots out the window, which unbeknownst to him, struck and killed Bartolet. The three assistants fled, leaving Bartolet’s body, which was later taken away by neighbors. Howe was arrested several days later, and still was not aware he had killed a man. He was not a murderer, since it was not his intention to kill anyone. It would likely be considered ‘manslaughter’, since he simply wished to scare off what he thought were would-be intruders.
Sadly, this one line – this one quote – from this television show, has turned William H. Howe into a mass-murdering coward that betrayed his country; a false reputation. With all the historical accounts available, we can see that William was a good man suffering from a horrible condition, one of five to walk away from the Battle of Fredericksburg, highly regarded by his officers, and accidentally ended a man’s life – I see a man that was truly a victim of unfortunate circumstances, which ultimately cost him his own life.
2 – “Mrs. Pratt, was a well-known woman, basically the only woman at the fort, who did many things for the soldiers; cooked meals for them, did their laundry, and took care of the injured soldiers there.”
Elizabeth Pratt was the wife of Sergt. Pratt of the United States Army. They had two children, one of which was born while they lived at Fort Mifflin. There are no records which indicate that Elizabeth Pratt cooked, cleaned and/or cared for the soldiers while she was there. This makes me wonder where Ms. Mallet obtained her information.
In addition, according to Lorraine, a Sergent’s wife would not be doing all of this work for enlisted men. Ms. Mellet’s statement is pure speculation, nothing more. Furthermore, she was not the only woman at the Fort. For example, Elizabeth Bunker, who is also considered a candidate for the “Screaming Woman”, was also a known female residing at the Fort (Selletti 2008).
3 – “She (Elizabeth Pratt) had a child, who died, of Typhoid Fever.”
Elizabeth Pratt had two children – and infant son and a young daughter. The infant son, who was not named, died on July 20, 1802. Her young daughter, also named Elizabeth, died less than five months later on December 6, 1802 (Ancestry.com 2013). Both children are believed to have died from Yellow Fever, not Typhoid Fever (Donahue-Irby 2013).
Yellow Fever is caused by a virus, transferred to humans by the bite of mosquitoes (PubMed.com 2013). In mild cases, yellow fever causes fever, headache, nausea and vomiting. In more serious cases, infected individuals can experience heart, liver and kidney problems along with bleeding (Mayo Clinic Staff 2011). Typhoid fever is commonly caused by bacteria called Salmonella. An infection develops that causes diarrhea and a rash. The bacteria are usually spread through contaminated food, drink, or water (PubMed.com 2013).
Although there is a record of their deaths (which includes names and dates), there is no Cause of Death listed. Within the book of Internment, the only notation with the names of the children, other than the date of death, is about their graves in the cemetery – “There are a great many graves in said Cemetery with out Tombstones or mark to designate them.” However, with further research into epidemics within Philadelphia, the most likely cause of death was found.
There were several epidemics of Yellow Fever throughout the United States, and they were recorded in the Report on the Etiology and Prevention of Yellow Fever of 1890. A quote from the report – “Pennsylvania – …the earliest onset of the disease occurred in 1699 (220 died of the estimated just under 4,000 inhabitants)…The next epidemics in Philadelphia occurred in 1741 (mortality 250), 1762, 1793 (mortality 4,041), 1794, 1797 (mortality 1,300), 1798 (mortality 3,500), 1799 (mortality 1,000), 1802 (mortality 307), 1803 (mortality 195), 1805 (mortality 400), 1819, 1820 (mortality 83), 1853 (mortality 128), 1870 (mortality 18).” (Sternberg 1890)
We can see that epidemics hit Philadelphia in 1802 and 1803, the years that coincide with the deaths of the Pratt children, including Elizabeth Pratt herself. Being that they lived at the Fort, which is on the river and a hotbed for mosquitoes, this is the most plausible cause of death.
4 – “She (Elizabeth Pratt) was so distraught over the death of her daughter, that she hung herself.”
Despite the constant retelling of this allegedly historical account, Elizabeth Pratt did NOT, I repeat – She Did NOT – hang herself. Listed in the Book of Interments, in the Fort Mifflin archives, is the record of Elizabeth Pratt’s death. She died on February 11, 1803 of Yellow Fever (Donahue-Irby 2013). Like with her children, there is no Cause of Death listed, but based on the information available, the most plausible cause of death was Yellow Fever (as we covered in the previous paragraphs).
Part of this story can be traced back to a book called “Philadelphia Ghost Stories” by Charlie Adams (Adams 1998). In the account presented, Elizabeth Pratt is said to have committed suicide a year after the death of her estranged child that died of Dysentery in 1801. From the records available, we know this version of the story is false; given Elizabeth Pratt died two years later in 1903. Unfortunately, the Adams version seems to have been passed around the paranormal community ever since, becoming the accepted ‘history’ for paranormal websites and other books.
This story has even been embellished over time to portray the daughter as having been involved with an enlisted man, which caused her to be “estranged” from her family. It’s important to note that when the Pratt members were reburied (the fort cemetery no longer exists), the daughter was recorded as “Elizabeth Pratt: Child” (Elizabeth Pratt’s daughter was also named Elizabeth) – indicating she would be unmarried and under the age of 12 to be so recorded (Selletti 2013).
Again, these versions of the story are completely false, as there is absolutely no documentation to back up such claims.
5 – “Upon entering the fort, you have the Officer’s Quarters, you have the Hospital and the General’s Quarters, where Mrs. Pratt stayed…we call it Mrs. Pratt’s room”
This statement is a voice-over, as images of the Fort’s buildings are displayed. Even this quick segment would have benefited from a few simple questions to the Fort Mifflin staff. Why? Well, the only correct statement in the voice-over was naming the Officer’s Quarters.
When the Hospital is mentioned, the interior of the Soldier’s Barracks is on screen. The Hospital is actually located outside of the fort walls and across the moat. The old hospital building is currently the Administrative offices of the Fort, and has been for many years.
As for the General’s Quarters…well, there are no General’s Quarters – not at all at Fort Mifflin. What is shown on screen is the exterior of the Soldier’s Barracks, which they had just shown the interior of and called it the Hospital.
Lastly, she mentions that in the General’s Quarters is “where Mrs. Pratt stayed.” I am amazed that she would imply that a Sergeant (and his family) would be living in the “General’s Quarters”, rather than..ya know, the General. Regardless, as stated previously, there wasn’t a General’s Quarters to begin with. However, we do know, from historical documents, that Serg. Pratt and family resided in a shack that once stood where the Artillery Shed is now located – on the opposite side of the courtyard (Williams 1802).
6 – “We walk behind the General’s Quarters and I snap a picture…and I looked at it, I was like ‘Wow’…it’s a Red Light Anomaly”.
While she is speaking about walking behind the “General’s Quarters”, the scene is actually showing her and her group walking into the Casemates, which is in a different location than where the picture was taken. Oh, and there still isn’t a building referred to as the “General’s Quarters” at Fort Mifflin. When Denise states that she snaps a picture, the scene is inside a Casemate, not behind the building shown in the photograph; the photo put on screen is from outside on the grounds, behind the Commandant’s House. This is shared blame: Denise uses a building name that is not associated with the Fort whatsoever, and the production crew screws up the editing of scenes and voice-overs, which makes it all look sloppy. And don’t get me started on the “Red Light anomaly” photo. Can we say “Long Exposure”?
Many ghost hunters make the mistake of switching their camera mode to a Night Scene (or similar) setting, which causes the camera to take a long exposure in low light scenes…such as at a Fort when it’s dark outside (This means the camera takes a longer time to take a picture). By doing this, the camera takes in more light and can make a dark sky appear illuminated. The long exposure and movement from being held by hand, causes an effect known as Camera Shake – which has a “double exposure” look, can create lines of light (Light Painting) from light sources, and also cause people to become transparent. The “red light anomaly” Denise presents is a result of a long exposure, not a ghost.
7 – “I’m suspecting that might be Billy Howe, because I picked up an evil vibe. Something bad….dangerous.”
This is speaking of a photograph Denise had taken of window in the Officer’s Quarters, which showed the reflection of the flash in the glass – a reflection that Denise mistakes for an evil face looking directly at her.
Based on the first statement Denise made about William Howe, this assumption does not surprise me. Just before William was hung, he read a letter to those in attendance, which was recorded and reprinted in the Philadelphia Inquirer (Philadelphia Inquirer 1864). Reading over this letter, one can easily see that Mr. Howe was deeply sorry for causing the death of Abraham Bartolet, and was at peace with himself and his maker. There were no underlying emotions of anger, hatred or anything that would be considered “evil”. This is simply an assumption based on incorrect historical information which was taken out of context, and further tarnishes the name of William Howe.
*The letter, which is handwritten, is six pages in length.
8 – “We all decided to take a walk to Casemate 5”
The view switches to a drawn map, which zeros in on Casemate 11 – which if you’re not familiar with the fort, is in a different area than Casemate 5. The next scene is of the group walking into the Torpedo Magazine – still a different location than Casemate 5. This is just bad editing, pure and simple. Had the production crew put any real effort into making sure they were editing correctly, this and many more editing mistakes would not have occurred. If the scene was made up of just walking shots, it would be no big deal. I included it here due to the use of a map, which viewers will identify with if visiting the fort, and perhaps go to the wrong locations.
9 – “Then all of a sudden, we heard a horrific blood-curdling scream…sounded like someone was being murdered. I was terrified…I couldn’t move. I’m thinking that the scream came from Mrs. Pratt, who was so distraught over the death of her daughter, that she hung herself.”
Once again, this false history of Elizabeth Pratt hanging herself is recited for the second time in this segment. None of the Pratt family hung themselves, please understand this. The Screaming Woman is a staple at Fort Mifflin, written about on countless websites from paranormal enthusiasts that claim to have heard the blood-curdling scream; described as sounding like a woman is being tortured. In the past, police have been called to the Fort in the real fear that a woman was in trouble, yet no one has ever been found in need of rescue. In discussing this phenomenon with Lorraine (who has heard the screams herself), I brought up the possibility that a variety of bird was the cause. The Fort Mifflin Disposal Area is a top location for bird watching in the State of Pennsylvania (MyBirdMaps.com 2010). Lorraine told me about a family of eagles that nest in the area. Although she admits that the eagles could be the cause of some of the screams heard, she isn’t convinced they explain all of the screams.
When I began researching into what eagles sound like, I found several videos on YouTube that offered clips of the eagles call (Honan 2007). So far, the calls from eagles seem to be broken up too much to be mistaken for a screaming woman in distress. Luckily, YouTube offers suggestions of similar videos based on your search. And I noticed a video for “Red-tailed hawk screaming” and clicked on it. Whoa…now THIS sounded like a screaming woman (Crowe 2007). Red-tailed hawks are common throughout the United States year round (AllAboutBirds.org 2013). A search of “Red tailed hawks in Philadelphia” came up with about 290,000 results, including many with a Live Webcam of a nest at the Franklin Institute. After listening to several other videos of the red-tailed hawk, I can definitely see (or rather hear) how this bird’s call could easily be mistaken for a frantic woman’s scream. This is a plausible explanation, and the most likely one since no one has yet to actually see the source of the “screaming”.
10 – “So we continued to walk, up to Mrs. Pratt’s room. I said, ok…I wanna leave the digital voice recorder in here, cause I picked up something playful…something wanted to play. It’s probably Mrs. Pratt’s daughter.”
Aside from the obvious assumption “It’s probably Mrs. Pratt’s daughter,” there is a major issue with this entire statement. The second floor and balcony of the Officer’s Quarter’s did not exist prior to the building’s renovations, which were completed in 1814 (Lonahue-Irby 2013). The Officer’s Quarters was a dilapidated building during the time the Pratt family was at the Fort, which means it was in a state of disrepair.
Here’s the kicker – as mentioned earlier in this article, Elizabeth Pratt died in 1803 – both of her children passing away the year before. Yes, after doing some quick math, we find that the room attributed to Mrs. Pratt over and over again, did NOT exist until approximately eleven years after she had died. Sorry, ghost hunters, you’ve been investigating with the wrong information.
As mentioned earlier, records indicate the Pratt family lived in a shack while at Fort Mifflin. Yes, according to historical records, there were three shacks where the Artillery Shed stands today.
This article demonstrates the importance of doing quality research, as opposed to simply reading a chapter in a regional ghost story book or watching a ghost hunting team on a YouTube video. I watched about a dozen videos, all by self-described “professional & scientific” teams which recycled the same false history we’ve covered here. This demonstrates that they didn’t do the historical research many claim they have. The culmination of this pseudo-research is when a nationally televised show takes the same lazy approach and broadcasts the wrong information to every ghost hunting enthusiast across the nation.
In the case of Fort Mifflin, we’re talking about a historic landmark, which played a pivotal role in the survival of our nation. We’re also talking about a site that has staff on site, which would have verified or corrected the historical information – if they had been consulted. I can’t help but ask, “why were the staff not consulted for accuracy?”
On a recent episode of Paramania Insider, Mark Phillips, the executive producer of My Ghost Story, was the featured guest. The hosts announced in the chat room that they were taking questions for Mark. I took them up on that invitation and typed “Does the show do any type of fact-checking of the historical information given by the story tellers?” At first, another person stated that people sometimes get nervous in front of the camera and say the wrong thing. I persisted, stating that “this was not a case of nerves, but the majority of historical information was grossly incorrect.” When the host presented my question to Mark, he replied, in a broken up sort of way, “…we do have a…um…we do have…ah…ah…a research group that… um…that ah…researches every story and um…researches the aspects of the story that our story tellers are telling us.” (Phillips 2013)
Judging by the way the Fort Mifflin segment was done, I would venture to say that this “research group” either skipped their job this time around, or need to be replaced since they obviously did not verify the historical information. At the very least, while they were filming the interviews, they could have called the Fort and asked “Hey, is this right?” When they found out it wasn’t, they could’ve immediately re-shot the interview with the right information.
From start to finish, it has taken me approximately two weeks to fully research and verify the information within this article. I stayed up into the wee hours of the morning tracking down documents from various sources and called, texted and instant-messaged historians at all times of the day and night. And this isn’t even my full time job – yet I did a job that was a thousand times better than a “research team” that’s paid to do the very same thing for a national television show.
Think about that for a moment…
Special Acknowledgements Lorraine Donahue-Irby, Office Manager & Book Keeper for Fort Mifflin Anthony Selletti, author of Fort Mifflin: A Paranormal History
References Biography.com. My Ghost Story. “Fear and Loathing in Fort Mifflin“. Air Date February 23, 2013. Accessed on March 5, 2013 http://www.biography.com/tv/my-ghost-story
Biography.com. My Ghost Story Episode 54., Accessed on March 5, 2013 (Note – this link may be unavailable, as they rotate available episodes on the site. At the time of this writing, it was still available) http://www.biography.com/…/episode-54-full-episode-19094083…
Selletti, Anthony L., SFO. 2008. Fort Mifflin: A Paranormal History. Chester, Pa. Selletti Press Ancestry.com. June 1863. US Civil War Draft Registrations Records. Accessed on March 16, 2013
Philadelphia Inquirer. August 27, 1864. Execution of WM. H. Howe, at Fort Mifflin.
Continuing off of my last post, Recommended Books, I’m going to answer the second question I get asked a lot; What podcasts do you listen to?
Below will be listed, in no particular order, the podcasts I’ve been an avid fan of overt he years. I’m partial to them because they provided not just entertainment, but quality information and education that has helped me or influenced my own research methods, writing style, and all-around knowledge base.
As I mentioned, there is no order to this list, I’ve added them as I thought of them. I have listened to at least a year’s worth of episodes, so these recommendations come from my experiences with each one (since it’s not fair to recommend anything one hasn’t tried first themselves. I’ll include links to websites where the podcasts may be found, but you should check whatever podcast app you use, such as iTunes, Stitcher, Spotify, etc.
At the very least, you might discover a new podcast that will bring you entertainment on your future road trips.
Enjoy.
Oh No, Ross and Carrie! Hosts – Ross Blotcher & Carrie Poppy
Welcome to Oh No, Ross and Carrie!, the show where we don’t just report on spirituality, fringe science and claims of the paranormal, but take part ourselves. We join religions, undergo alternative medical treatments, and hunt for ghost, goblins, demons, and deities. If it has an extraordinary claim attached to it, we’ll check it out.
Since starting the show in 2011, we have been ear-candled, fire-cupped, energy-healed, sensory-deprived, exorcised, overheated, and more. We’ve joined Scientology, Mormonism, Raëlism, Eckankar, the Ordo Templi Orientis, and others. We’ve looked for ghosts on the Queen Mary, the future in our palms, and the past in our subconscious. Our unlikely, exciting adventures have been celebrated by The Guardian, NPR, Gizmodo, Boing Boing, Mental Floss, The Onion’s AV Club, The LA Press Club, and others.
Squaring the Strange Hosts – Benjamin Radford, Celestia Ward, and Pascual Romero
Welcome to the official Facebook page of Squaring the Strange podcast! Hosted by Benjamin Radford, Celestia Ward, and Pascual Romero, Squaring the Strange brings evidence-based analysis and commentary to a wide variety of topics, ranging from the paranormal to current events.
Investigating ghosts. Debunking conspiracies. Dodging chupacabras. Calling shenanigans where appropriate.
If a claim seems strange, Ben, Celestia, and Pascual will try to square it with the facts. Along the way, listeners will learn about psychology, myths, hoaxes, folklore, science, and all the things that add up to strange experiences—both real and unreal.
Skeptoid is an award-winning weekly science podcast. Since 2006, Skeptoid has been revealing the true science behind popular misinformation and urban legends.
Skeptoid generally examines four basic types of popular pseudosciences:
The Skeptics’ Guide to the Universe Hosts – Dr. Steve Novella, Jay Novella, Cara Santa Maria, Bob Novella, and Evan Berstein
The Skeptics’ Guide to the Universe is a weekly 80-minute podcast hosted by Steven Novella, MD, along with a panel of “skeptical rogues.” It is named to evoke The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy and is the official podcast of the New England Skeptical Society. The show features discussions of recent scientific developments in layman’s terms, and interviews authors, people in the area of science, and other famous skeptics. The show also includes discussions of myths, conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, the paranormal, and many general forms of superstition, from the point of view of scientific skepticism. Steven Novella, the host of the show, has been particularly active in debunking pseudoscience in medicine.
Stuff to Blow Your Mind Hosts – Robert Lamb and Joe McCormick
Prepare for a trip down the rabbit hole as Robert Lamb and Joe McCormick lead you on a scientific journey to the very limits of human understanding. “Stuff to Blow Your Mind” examines neurological quandaries, cosmic mysteries, evolutionary marvels and the technological underpinnings of our transhuman future.
“Stuff to Blow Your Mind” began life in January 2010 as “Stuff From the Science Lab,” hosted by HSW Science Writer Robert Lamb and HSW Science Editor Allison Loudermilk. Later that Year, Julie Douglas joined the team and co-hosted the re-branded STBYM podcast with Robert until her departure in June 2015. That’s when Joe McCormick and Christian Sager came aboard. Christian left the show in November 2017.
The Podcast from Australia for Science and Reason. Join Richard Saunders and his team of reporters for your weekly dose of skeptical news and interviews, reports and comments.
Past guests have included, James Randi, Stephen Fry, Tim Minchin, Eugenie Scott, Dr Phil Plait, Michael Marshall, Dr Steve Novella, Dr Pamela Gay, Jon Ronson, Dr Ben Goldacre, Simon Singh, Prof. Richard Wiseman, Dick Smith, Banachek, Prof. Chris French, George Hrab, Tim Ferguson, Dr Paul Willis and many, many more.
Featuring Australian radio legend Maynard with his Spooky Action, Jo Alabaster from the ‘Evidence Please’ blog, Eran Segev’s Grain of Salt, Dr Rachael Dunlop with ‘Dr Rachie Reports’ and Heidi Robertson aka ‘The Raw Skeptic’.
There are a lot of fads, blogs and strong opinions, but then there’s SCIENCE. Science Vs is the show from Gimlet Media that finds out what’s fact, what’s not, and what’s somewhere in between. We do the hard work of sifting through all the science so you don’t have to. This season we tackle football concussions, heartbreak, 5G networks, sleep, magic mushrooms, free healthcare, police use of force, asteroids and more.
Point of Inquiry Hosts – Kavin Senapathy and James Underdown
Point of Inquiry is the Center for Inquiry’s flagship podcast, where the brightest minds of our time engage in deep conversation about the big questions in science, religion, politics, and culture.
Since 2005, some of the show’s remarkable guests have included Ta-Nehisi Coates, Brian Greene, Susan Jacoby, Richard Dawkins, Ann Druyan, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Eugenie Scott, Adam Savage, Bill Nye, Howard Fineman, Sam Harris, and Francis Collins, among many, many others.
Photography Tips From the Top Floor Host – Chris Marquardt
Tips from the Top Floor is a weekly show about photography. It is brought to you by photographic mythbuster Chris Marquardt. When he’s not on a commercial assignment, Chris is an educator, teaching photographers all over the world, on workshops and photo tours to exciting places like the Himalayas, Ethiopia, the Arctic or Donegal in Ireland. Watch Chris live all over the world, as the Photo Guy on the Tech Guy Radio Show with Leo Laporte.
The Psychology Podcast Host – Dr. Scott Barr Kaufman
Welcome to The Psychology Podcast with Dr. Scott Barry Kaufman, where we give you insights into the mind, brain, behavior and creativity. Each episode will feature a guest who will stimulate your mind, and give you a greater understanding of yourself, others, and the world we live in. Hopefully, we’ll also provide a glimpse into human possibility! Thanks for listening and enjoy the podcast.
The Spooktator Hosts – Hayley Stevens, Paul Gannon, and Charlie Revelle
The Spooktator podcast examines the stranger elements of life, society, international culture, and the media. Hosted by a sceptical paranormal researcher, a producer and comedian who ain’t afraid of no ghost, and a writer with a penchant for the macabre, the podcast offers a unique perspective on the weird world we all inhabit.
15 Credibility Street Hosts – Sharon Hill and Torkel
A sharp-eyed view of questionable claims. Evidence-based critique of news of the paranormal, pseudoscience, health claims, and anomalies. Official Podcast of Doubtful News. *These are archived episodes.
Over the years, I’ve been asked these questions several times; 1 – What books do you recommend? 2 – What podcasts do you listen to?
I figured I’d make short lists that answer both questions, making it easier to share with a link as apposed to typing out the titles & authors. This post will cover some of my favorite books that have helped prepare me for investigating and solving mysteries.
I have read all the books on this list in their entirety. I haven’t included any books in which I’ve only read in part, since that wouldn’t make for a fair recommendation. I’ll also provide links if you’re interested in acquiring the books for yourselves. Theses are Amazon link for my convenience only, I do not get any kick-backs or commissions from these links, so don’t feel obligated to use them. It was just easier to copy links & description from one site.
Also, this list is not in a ranked or in any other particular order. They were included as they came to mind and I wrote them down in my little notepad to transcribe later. You may not agree with some of my choices or the authors, but…this is my list, so there. Go make your own. Haha. Anyhoo, I’ve learned a great deal from these books (and more), so if you’re interested, I encourage you to pick up a few. Hopefully they will teach you something too.
Enjoy.
Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking by M. Neil Browne and Stuart M. Keely
Used in a variety of courses in various disciplines, Asking the Right Questions helps students bridge the gap between simply memorizing or blindly accepting information, and the greater challenge of critical analysis and synthesis. Specifically, this concise text teaches students to think critically by exploring the components of arguments–issues, conclusions, reasons, evidence, assumptions, language–and on how to spot fallacies and manipulations and obstacles to critical thinking in both written and visual communication. It teaches them to respond to alternative points of view and develop a solid foundation for making personal choices about what to accept and what to reject. Find it Here– Asking the Right Questions
Spook: Science Tackles the Afterlife by Mary Roach
“What happens when we die? Does the light just go out and that’s that―the million-year nap? Or will some part of my personality, my me-ness persist? What will that feel like? What will I do all day? Is there a place to plug in my lap-top?” In an attempt to find out, Mary Roach brings her tireless curiosity to bear on an array of contemporary and historical soul-searchers: scientists, schemers, engineers, mediums, all trying to prove (or disprove) that life goes on after we die. Find it Here– Spook: Science Tackles the Afterlife
Investigating Ghost: The Scientific Search for Spirits by Ben Radford
Ghosts have fascinated and haunted us for millennia. They appear in our campfire tales, films, books, and television shows as well as in our dreams and nightmares. Despite widespread belief in spirits and the popularity of television ghost hunting shows, scientific evidence for them remains elusive. Investigating Ghosts is the first book to examine the history and techniques of ghost hunting from folkloric, scientific, and sociocultural perspectives.
No mere armchair scholar, author Benjamin Radford’s book is based on nearly twenty years of first-hand, science-based investigations and research. Investigating Ghosts will entertain and educate skeptics and true believers alike, separating fact from fiction about this timeless mystery.
Topics include: 1) Guidelines for scientifically investigating ghost reports; 2) Analyzing photographic, audio, and video evidence; 3) Ghost hunting equipment: What works, what doesn’t, and why; 4) In-depth case studies of solved ghost investigations; 5) Understanding the psychology of ghost experiences
Camera Clues: A Handbook for Photographic Investigation by Joe Nickell
In Camera Clues, Joe Nickell shares his methods of identifying and dating old photos and demonstrates how to distinguish originals from copies and fakes. Particularly intriguing are his discussions of camera tricks, darkroom manipulations, retouching techniques, and uses of computer technology to deceive the eye. Camera Clues concludes with a look at allegedly “paranormal” photography, from nineteenth-century “spirit photographs” to UFO snapshots.
Scientifical Americans: The Culture of Amateur Paranormal Researchers by Sharon Hill
In the 21st century, reality television and the Internet have fed public interest in ghosts, UFOs, cryptozoology and other unusual phenomena. By 2010, roughly 2000 amateur research and investigation groups formed in the U.S.–ghost hunters, Bigfoot chasers and UFO researchers, using an array of (supposedly) scientific equipment and methods to prove the existence of the paranormal.
American culture’s honorific regard for science, coupled with the public’s unfamiliarity with scientific methods, created a niche for self-styled paranormal experts to achieve national renown without scientific training or credentials. The author provides a comprehensive examination of the ideas, missions and methods promoted by these passionate amateurs.
The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark by Carl Sagan
How can we make intelligent decisions about our increasingly technology-driven lives if we don’t understand the difference between the myths of pseudoscience and the testable hypotheses of science? Pulitzer Prize-winning author and distinguished astronomer Carl Sagan argues that scientific thinking is critical not only to the pursuit of truth but to the very well-being of our democratic institutions.
Casting a wide net through history and culture, Sagan examines and authoritatively debunks such celebrated fallacies of the past as witchcraft, faith healing, demons, and UFOs. And yet, disturbingly, in today’s so-called information age, pseudoscience is burgeoning with stories of alien abduction, channeling past lives, and communal hallucinations commanding growing attention and respect. As Sagan demonstrates with lucid eloquence, the siren song of unreason is not just a cultural wrong turn but a dangerous plunge into darkness that threatens our most basic freedoms.
Mastermind: How to Think Like Sherlock Holmes by Maria Konnikova
No fictional character is more renowned for his powers of thought and observation than Sherlock Holmes. But is his extraordinary intellect merely a gift of fiction, or can we learn to cultivate these abilities ourselves, to improve our lives at work and at home?
We can, says psychologist and journalist Maria Konnikova, and in Mastermind she shows us how. Beginning with the “brain attic”—Holmes’s metaphor for how we store information and organize knowledge—Konnikova unpacks the mental strategies that lead to clearer thinking and deeper insights. Drawing on twenty-first-century neuroscience and psychology, Mastermind explores Holmes’s unique methods of ever-present mindfulness, astute observation, and logical deduction. In doing so, it shows how each of us, with some self-awareness and a little practice, can employ these same methods to sharpen our perceptions, solve difficult problems, and enhance our creative powers. For Holmes aficionados and casual readers alike, Konnikova reveals how the world’s most keen-eyed detective can serve as an unparalleled guide to upgrading the mind.
Harry Houdini (1874-1926), whose real name was Erik Weisz, was one of the most famous magicians and escapologists of all time. He was highly sceptical of the many claims made concerning psychic and paranormal phenomena, which were very popular in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. He attended hundreds of séances for the purposes of his study, and never experienced one he believed genuine. In this book, published in 1924, he described the mediums and psychics whom he revealed as fraudulent, exposing the tricks which had convinced many notable scientists and academics. These included spirit writing, table rapping, spirit manifestations, and levitation. Among those he revealed as frauds was the famous medium Mina Crandon, and his exposures led to a public split with his former friend Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, a firm believer.
Cold reading can be loosely defined as ‘how to talk to people so you sound psychic’. This is the definitive guide to how cold reading is used in the psychic industry. It systematically describes a wide range of techniques that enable those who give readings to make seemingly accurate statements to a complete stranger. These statements can refer to past, current or future events or to the client’s personality, feelings and potential.This is primarily a descriptive book, not an instructional one. It’s primary aim is to describe cold reading techniques rather than to teach anyone how to use them or how to give readings.
Flim-Flam! Psychics, ESP, Unicorns, and Other Delusions by James Randi
James Randi is internationally known as a magician and escape artist. But for the past thirty-five years of his professional life, he has also been active as an investigator of the paranormal, occult, and supernatural claims that have impressed the thinking of the public for a generation: ESP, psychokinesis, psychic detectives, levitation, psychic surgery, UFOs, dowsing, astrology, and many others. Those of us unable to discriminate between geniune scientific research and the pseudoscientific nonsense that has resulted in fantastic theories and fancies have long needed James Randi and Flim-Flam!In this book, Randi explores and exposes what he believes to be the outrageous deception that has been promoted widely in the media. Unafraid to call researchers to account for their failures and impostures, Randi tells us that we have been badly served by scientists who have failed to follow the procedures required by their training and traditions. Here he shows us how what he views as sloppy research has been followed by rationalizations of evident failures, and we see these errors and misrepresentations clearly pointed out. Mr. Randi provides us with a compelling and convincing document that will certainly startle and enlighten all who read it.
Paranormality: Why We See What Isn’t There by Professor Richard Wiseman
Professor Richard Wiseman is clear about one thing: paranormal phenomena don’t exist. But in the same way that the science of space travel transforms our everyday lives, so research into telepathy, fortune-telling and out-of-body experiences produces remarkable insights into our brains, behaviour and beliefs. Paranormality embarks on a wild ghost chase into this new science of the supernatural and is packed with activities that allow you to experience the impossible. So throw away your crystals, ditch your lucky charms and cancel your subscription to Reincarnation Weekly. It is time to discover the real secrets of the paranormal. Learn how to control your dreams — and leave your body behind Convince complete strangers that you know all about them Unleash the power of your unconscious mind
According to many clinical psychologists, when the mind is forced to endure a horrifying experience, it has the ability to bury the entire memory of it so deeply within the unconscious that it can only be recalled in the form of a flashback triggered by a sight, a smell, or a sound. Indeed, therapists and lawyers have created an industry based on treating and litigating the cases of people who suddenly claim to have “recovered” memories of everything from child abuse to murder.
This book reveals that despite decades of research, there is absolutely no controlled scientific support for the idea that memories of trauma are routinely banished into the unconscious and then reliably recovered years later. Since it is not actually a legitimate psychological phenomenon, the idea of “recovered memory”–and the movement that has developed alongside it–is thus closer to a dangerous fad or trendy witch hunt.
Psychic Blues: Confessions of a Conflicted Medium by Mark Edward
Mark Edward confesses that for years he exploited believers who wished to connect with supernatural ideas and sad family members who missed dead loved ones.
Edward is a professional mentalist who has worked the Magic Castle in Hollywood for over thirty years and is also on the Editorial Board of Skeptic magazine, where he has worked with other critical thinkers to reveal the methods of psychic scamsters. This entertaining book is at once confessional and instructional regarding human belief and those who exploit it.
Edward believes that most practitioners of the psychic business are out-and-out scam artists, and that the common need to believe in things supernatural is merely a part of human nature.
The Memory Illusion: Remembering, Forgetting, and the Science of False Memory by Dr. Julia Shaw
Memories make us who we are—yet the truth is they are far from being the accurate record we like to think they are. We can all admit to occasional memory lapses, but what if we have the potential for more profound errors of memory, even verging on outright fabrication and self-deception? Forensic psychologist and memory expert Dr. Julia Shaw uses the latest research to show the astonishing variety of ways in which our brains can be led astray. She shows why we can misappropriate other people’s memories, believing them to be our own. She explains how police officers can imprison an innocent man for life on the basis of 300 denials and just one confession. She demonstrates the way radically false memories can be deliberately implanted, leading people to believe that they brutally murdered a loved one, or were abducted by aliens. And she reveals how, in spite of all this, we can improve our memory through awareness of its fallibility.
Media Mythmakers: How Journalists, Activists, and Advertisers Mislead Us by Ben Radford
Fake news? Biased media sources? This hard-hitting critique of our media culture examines not only the ways in which the public is often deceived, but the media’s role in propagating those deceptions. But Media Mythmakers goes beyond criticism to give concrete examples of the damage that manipulation of the news causes. From missing children to the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, from the efforts to end slavery to AIDS education, myths and deception in the media threaten us all. While the public is being misled, real problems go unaddressed and resources are wasted on misguided ideas.In an increasingly complex world, where accurate and unbiased information is more important than ever, this book provides a timely and much-needed analysis.
Do psychics have special powers, allowing them to succeed where ordinary police work fails? How often do the police actually enlist psychics in solving crimes, and what do they really think of these paranormal “experts”? These are just some of the questions discussed in this illuminating study of those who supposedly use extrasensory powers to help solve crimes.
Famed paranormal investigator Joe Nickell assembled a psychic “task force” of experienced researchers – investigative writers, professional magicians, private detectives, and paranormal investigators – and challenged them to examine the claims of a famous paranormal crimebuster. Among the “psychic sleuths” examined are Greta Alexander, Dorothy Allison, Gerard Croiset, Peter Hurkos, Phil Jordan, Rosemarie Kerr, Noreen Reiner, and Bill Ward. Noted psychologist James E. Alcock offers an assessment of the psychics’ claims in light of the investigative reports.
Nickell’s distinguished team of investigators includes Michael R. Dennett, Professor Kenneth Feder, Henry Gordon, Jim Lippard, Ward Lucas, Professor Michael Park, Stephen Peterson, Dr. Gary Posner, and Professor Lee Roger Taylor.
Psychic Sleuths will excite the curiosity of both skeptics and believers, and all who are puzzled by psychic claims and paranormal mysteries.
The Complete Sherlock Holmes Collection by Arthur Conan Doyle
With a luxurious, foiled arlin cover and gilded page edgees, this deluxe and expansive edition, produced in association with The Sherlock Holmes Museum at 221B Baker Street, is the definitive collection for fans of the great detective. It contains all of Conan Doyle’s stories—four novels and a colossal 56 short stories—complete and unabridged, encompassing the entirety of the legendary author’s Sherlock Holmes work. When Sir Arthur Conan Doyle introduced the world to Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson in 1887’s A Study in Scarlet, a true icon of literature was born. Since then, their humble address at 221B Baker Street has become almost as famous as the great detective himself, with the incredible popularity of Sherlock Holmes’s adventures never wavering over the last 130 years.
Terminology is important. The most basic element of useful
discussion is that we are all “talking the same language” and agree on common
definitions. Many paranormal groups use terminology incorrectly in articles,
blogs, hosting 101-type classes, and/or lectures or seminars. In these
instances, they are passing along incorrect and sometimes outright false
information to the public. Groups may also add their own spin (variations) to
accepted definitions, in order to better fit their needs or belief. I’ve heard
groups talk of “calibrated” devices, “puberty” causing paranormal phenomenon,
and “finely tuned algorithms” that allow for paranormal-themed devices to
detect and communicate with ghosts. In turn, this misinformation is passed
along to others as they repeat the errors.
I have compiled this list of terms used in research, investigation, debates, and more. These terms include common logical fallacies, scientific, psychological and technical terms as well as photography-related terms that are commonly used. The descriptions have been complied from various sources; I did not write these. The terminology is not restricted to one aspect of the paranormal community, but can apply to all subject areas – ghosts, UFOs, Cryptozoology, psychics, belief, etc. Hopefully, this can be a quick reference for anyone using these terms in their various activities. It’s also not a bad way to learn something new. There’s a lot of terms, many of which I didn’t even know existed until I began this project.
Abductive reasoning – a form of logical inference which starts with an observation or set of observations then seeks to find the simplest and most likely explanation for the observations. This process, unlike deductive reasoning, yields a plausible conclusion but does not positively verify it.
Ad Hominem (Logical Fallacy) – An argument that attempts to counter another’s claim or conclusions by attacking the person, rather than addressing the argument itself. Calling someone a name is not in itself a logical fallacy, it is only a fallacy to claim that an argument is wrong because of a negative attribute of someone making the argument.
Ad Ignorantiam (Logical Fallacy) – States that a specific belief is true because we don’t know that it isn’t true. In order to make a positive claim, however, positive evidence for the specific claim must be presented. The absence of another explanation only means that we do not know – it doesn’t mean we get to make up a specific explanation.
Agent – a person or thing that takes an active role or produces a specified effect.
Algorithm – A process or set of rules to be followed in calculations or other problem-solving operations, especially by a computer; a set of steps that are followed in order to solve a mathematical problem or to complete a computer process.
Altered States of Consciousness (ASCs) – A mental state other than ordinary waking consciousness, found during sleep, dreaming, psychoactive drug use, hypnosis, etc.
Amplitude – Height of a light or sound wave; pertaining to light, it refers to brightness, for sound, it refers to loudness.
Anchoring Effect – this is a cognitive bias that describes the common human tendency to rely too heavily on the first piece of information offered. … Once an anchor is set, other judgments are made by adjusting away from that anchor, and there is a bias toward interpreting other information around the anchor
Anecdotes – Short accounts of a particular incident, based on personal observation, case study reports, or random investigations rather than systematic scientific evaluation. Anecdotes are non-scientific observations which do not provide proof but may assist research efforts in guiding where to look deeper.
Anomalistic Psychology – The study of extraordinary phenomena of behavior and experience, including (but not restricted to) those which are often labeled “paranormal”. It is directed towards understanding bizarre experiences that many people have without assuming a priori that there is anything paranormal involved. It entails attempting to explain paranormal and related beliefs and ostensibly paranormal experiences in terms of known psychological and physical factors. Term was first suggested by the psychologists Leonard Zusne and Warren Jones in their book Anomalistic Psychology: A Study of Magical Thinking (1989) which systematically treats phenomena of human consciousness and behaviors that may appear to violate the laws of nature when they actually do not.
Anomaly – Something that deviates from what is standard, normal, or expected; an unexpected, unusual, or strange condition, situation, or quality.
Aperture – An opening inside the camera that allows the image sensor to catch a glimpse of the scene to capture. Aperture settings reflect the size of that hole. The larger the hole the more light that gets in – the smaller the hole the less light. Aperture is measured in ‘f-stops’ or f/number – for example f/2.8, f/4, f/5.6,f/8,f/22 etc. Moving from one f-stop to the next doubles or halves the size of the amount of opening in your lens (and the amount of light getting through).
Apophenia – The spontaneous perception of connections and meaningfulness of unrelated phenomena; the experience of seeing meaningful patterns or connections in random or meaningless data. The term was coined by neurologist Klaus Conrad and defined as the “unmotivated seeing of connections.” Pareidolia is a form of apophenia.
Apparition – a ghost or ghost-like image of a person.
Appeal to Authority (Logical Fallacy) – A defense used in an argument that claims that because an authority thinks something, it must therefore be true. This fallacy is not meant to dismiss the claims of experts, or scientific consensus. It is not typically reasonable to disregard the claims of experts who have a demonstrated depth of knowledge unless one has a similar level of understanding and/or access to empirical evidence. However it is, entirely possible that the opinion of a person or institution of authority is wrong; therefore the authority that such a person or institution holds does not have any intrinsic bearing upon whether their claims are true or not.
Appeal to Emotion (Logical Fallacy) – An attempt to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument. Appeals to emotion include appeals to fear, envy, hatred, pity, pride, and more. A logically coherent argument may inspire emotion or have an emotional aspect, but the problem and fallacy occurs when emotion is used instead of a logical argument, or to obscure the fact that no compelling rational reason exists for one’s position. Appeals to emotion are a very common and effective argument tactic, but they’re ultimately flawed.
Appeal to Tradition (Logical Fallacy) – The fallacy that a point of view, situation, or action is right, proper and correct simply because it has “always” been that way, because people have “always” thought that way, or because it continues to serve one particular group very well.
Assumption – A thing that is accepted as true or as certain to happen, without proof; something that is taken for granted; a supposition.
Audio Pareidolia – The act of hearing words that are not actually there. This can occur by misinterpreting words that are being said, or by hearing words in random noise. The phenomenon is similar to visual pareidolia in that the brain, in searching for a recognized pattern, finds the closest match, and then processes the incoming sensory information to enhance the apparent match.
Autokinetic Effect – Refers to perceiving a stationary point of light in the dark as moving. Psychologists attribute the perception of movement where there is none to “small, involuntary movements of the eyeball” (Schick and Vaughn 1995: 47). The autokinetic effect can be enhanced by the power of suggestion: If one person reports that a light is moving, others will be more likely to report the same thing (Zusne and Jones).
Automatic Writing – also known as psychography, is a claimed psychic ability allowing a person to produce written words without consciously writing. The words purportedly arise from a subconscious, spiritual or supernatural source. Automatic Writing –
Backfire Effect – an aspect of psychology. When an opinion is contradicted by facts, instead of the opinion changing, it gets further strengthened. Due to this effect, whenever you are confronted with information and facts that contradict something you believe, instead of changing your view or forming a new opinion, your original beliefs will often be strengthened.
Baader-Meinhof Phenomenon – a phenomenon where something you recently learned suddenly appears ‘everywhere’. Also called Frequency Bias (or Illusion), the Baader-Meinhof Phenomenon is the seeming appearance of a newly learned (or paid attention to) concept in unexpected places.
Bandwagon (Logical Fallacy) – An appeal to popularity, or the fact that many people do something, as an attempted form of validation. Popularity of an idea has no bearing on its validity.
Barnum Effect – The Barnum effect, also called the Forer effect, or less commonly the Barnum-Forer effect, is a common psychological phenomenon whereby individuals give high accuracy ratings to descriptions of their personality that supposedly are tailored specifically to them, that are in fact vague and general enough to apply to a wide range of people.[1] This effect can provide a partial explanation for the widespread acceptance of some paranormal beliefs and practices, such as astrology, fortune telling, aura reading, and some types of personality tests.
Belief – Confidence in the truth of or existence of something not immediately susceptible to rigorous proof; an acceptance that a statement is true or that something exists; a firmly held opinion or conviction.
Belief-Bias Effect – Refers to the results that happen when an individual’s own values, beliefs, prior knowledge, etc. affects, or distorts the reasoning process through the acceptance of invalid arguments or data. This can happen when an observer assumes ahead of time that he knows what the results of an experiment will be and uses that belief to distort the results.
Belief Perseverance – The tendency to cling to one’s initial belief even after receiving new information that contradicts or disconfirms the basis of that belief; tendency or unwillingness to admit their foundational premises are incorrect even when shown convincing evidence to the contrary; tendency to persist with one’s held beliefs despite the fact that the information is inaccurate or that evidence shows otherwise.
Bias – A particular tendency or inclination, especially one that prevents unprejudiced consideration of a question; prejudice in favor of or against one thing, person, or group compared with another, usually in a way considered to be unfair.
Black or White (Logical Fallacy) – The presentation of only two alternative states as the only possibilities, when in fact more possibilities exist. Also known as the false dilemma, this insidious tactic has the appearance of forming a logical argument; it frames the argument misleadingly and obscures rational, honest debate.
Blind Loyalty (Logical Fallacy) – The dangerous fallacy that an argument or action is right simply and solely because a respected leader or source (an expert, parents, one’s own “side,” team or country, one’s boss or commanding officers) say it is right. This is over-reliance on authority, a corrupted argument from ethos that puts loyalty above truth or above one’s own reason and conscience.
Blood is Thicker than Water (Logical Fallacy) – The reverse of the “Ad Hominem” fallacy, a corrupt argument from ethos where a statement, argument or action is automatically regarded as true, correct and above challenge because one is related to, or knows and likes, or is on the same team as the individual involved.
Bullying – Unwanted, aggressive behavior typical among school-aged children that involves a real or perceived power imbalance. The behavior is repeated, or has potential to be repeated, over time. Bullying includes actions such as making threats, spreading rumors, attacking someone physically or verbally, and excluding someone from a group.
Burden of Proof – A responsibility for supporting a claim with valid evidence. This responsibility rests with the person who is making a claim, and NOT upon anyone else to disprove. The inability, or disinclination, to disprove a claim does not render the original claim valid, nor give it any credence. Value to any claim is assigned via the available evidence, but to dismiss something on the basis that it hasn’t been proven beyond all doubt is fallacious reasoning.
Calibrate – To correlate the readings of (an instrument) with those of a standard in order to check the instrument’s accuracy.
Camera Shake – The camera moves while the shutter is open resulting in motion blur in the photos.
Cargo Cult Science – A term first used by physicist Richard Feynman during his commencement address at the California Institute of Technology, United States, in 1974, to negatively characterize research in the soft sciences (psychology and psychiatry in particular) arguing that they have the semblance of being scientific, but are missing “a kind of scientific integrity, a principle of scientific thought that corresponds to a kind of utter honesty”. The phrase is based on a concept in anthropology, the cargo cult, which describes how some pre-scientific cultures interpreted technologically advanced visitors as religious or supernatural figures who brought boons of cargo. Later, in an effort to call for a second visit the natives would develop and engage in complex religious rituals, mirroring the previously observed behavior of the visitors manipulating their machines but without understanding the true nature of those tasks. Just as cargo cultists created mock airports that fail to produce airplanes, cargo cult scientists conduct flawed research that superficially resembles the scientific method, but which fails to produce scientifically useful results.
Case Study – An in-depth study of a single research participant or event.
Causality – The relationship between cause and effect; the connection between two events or states such that one produces or brings about the other where one is the cause and the other is the effect; the principle that everything has a cause.
Chance – The possibility of something happening; the occurrence and development of events in the absence of any obvious design; something that happens unpredictably without discernible human intention or observable cause; the possibility of a particular outcome in an uncertain situation; the degree of likelihood of such an outcome.
Circle of Confusion – in optics, a circle of confusion is an optical spot caused by a cone of light rays from a lens not coming to a perfect focus when imaging a point source. It is also known as disk of confusion, circle of indistinctness, blur circle, or blur spot.
Claim – To state or assert that something is the case, often without providing evidence or proof; an assertion of the truth of something, typically one that is disputed or in doubt; to assert or maintain as a fact.
Clarify – To check that both the speaker and listener are of the same understanding; to make (a statement or situation) less confused and more clearly comprehensible.
Closed-Minded (or close-minded) – Having or showing rigid opinions or a narrow outlook; obstinately resistant to argument or to unfamiliar or unwelcome ideas; having a mind firmly unreceptive to new ideas or arguments.
Clustering Illusion – the intuition that random events which occur in clusters are not really random events. The illusion is due to selective thinking based on a counterintuitive but false assumption regarding statistical odds.
Conditioning – Also known as classical conditioning or Pavlovian conditioning, a form of learning and expectation based on the experience of association between a stimulus and a response.
Cognitive – Of or pertaining to the mental processes of perception, memory, judgment, and reasoning, as contrasted with emotional and volitional processes; conscious mental activities: the activities of thinking, understanding, learning and remembering.
Cognitive Dissonance – Mental conflict that occurs when beliefs or assumptions are contradicted by new information. The concept was introduced by the psychologist Leon Festinger (1919–89) in the late 1950s. He and later researchers showed that, when confronted with challenging new information, most people seek to preserve their current understanding of the world by rejecting, explaining away, or avoiding the new information or by convincing themselves that no conflict really exists.
Coincidence – A striking occurrence of two or more events at one time apparently by mere chance. The occurrence of events at the same time by accident but seem to have some connection.
Cold Reading – A series of techniques used by mentalists, psychics, mediums, fortune tellers and illusionists to determine or express personal details of another person, often in order to convince someone that the reader knows a great deal more about a person (mark) than they actually do. Cold Readers use high probability guesses about the subject, quickly picking up on unconscious signals from their subjects as to whether guesses are in the right direction or not. They emphasize and reinforce chance connections the subject acknowledges while quickly moving pass missed guesses.
Complex Question, The (Logical Fallacy) – The fallacy of demanding a direct answers to a question that cannot be answered without first analyzing or challenging the basis of the question itself. Also applies to situations where one is forced to either accept or reject complex standpoints or propositions containing both acceptable and unacceptable parts.
Conclusion – A judgment or decision reached by reasoning. The last step in a reasoning process; judgment, decision, or opinion formed after investigation or thought.
Cones – Receptor cells concentrated near the center of the retina responsible for color vision and fine detail; most sensitive in brightly lit areas.
Confabulation – In psychology, a memory disturbance, defined as the production of fabricated, distorted or misinterpreted memories about oneself or the world, without the conscious intention to deceive. Confusion of an event that happened to someone else with one that happened to you, or a belief that you remember something when it never actually happened. In psychiatry, it is the replacement of a gap in a person’s memory by a falsification that he or she believes to be true, to fill in gaps in memory by fabrication.
Confirmation Bias – A phenomenon wherein decision makers have been shown to actively seek out and assign more weight to evidence that confirms their hypothesis and ignore or under weigh evidence that could disconfirm their hypothesis. It is a tendency to search for and interpret information in a way that confirms one’s preconceptions, leading to statistical errors. As such, it can be thought of as a form of selection bias in collecting evidence.
Contagion (Psychology) – The spread of a behavior pattern, attitude, or emotion from person to person or group to group through suggestion, propaganda, rumor or imitation.
Continuous Reinforcement – A reinforcement schedule in which a particular response is always reinforced.
Control – An experiment or observation designed to minimize the effects of variables other than the single independent variable. This increases the reliability of the results, often through the comparison between control measurements and other measurements. Ideally, all variables in an experiment will be controlled.
Copyright – a form of intellectual property law, protects original works of authorship including literary, dramatic, musical, and artistic works, such as poetry, novels, movies, songs, computer software, and architecture.
Correlation – A mutual relationship or connection between two or more things; the relationship between things that happen or change together; a measure of how strongly two variables are related to each other.
Correlation Does Not Imply Causation – A phrase in science and statistics that emphasize that a correlation between two variables does not necessarily imply that one causes the other.
Credulous – Having or showing too great a readiness to believe things; willing to believe or trust too readily, especially without proper or adequate evidence; gullible.
Critical Thinking – The identification and evaluation of evidence to guide decision making. A critical thinker uses a broad in-depth analysis of evidence to make decisions and communicate beliefs clearly and accurately. Critical thinking is that mode of thinking — about any subject, content, or problem — in which the thinker improves the quality of his or her thinking by skillfully analyzing, assessing, and reconstructing it. Critical thinking is self-directed, self-disciplined, self-monitored, and self-corrective thinking. It presupposes assent to rigorous standards of excellence and mindful command of their use. It entails effective communication and problem-solving abilities, as well as a commitment to overcome our native egocentrism and sociocentrism.
Critical Thinker – A person who has the following qualities:
Is open-minded and mindful of alternatives
Desires to be, and is, well informed
Judges well the credibility of sources
Identifies reasons, assumptions and conclusions
Asks appropriate clarifying questions
Judges well the quality of an argument, including its reasons, assumptions, evidence, and their degree of support for the conclusion
Can well develop and defend a reasonable position regarding a belief or an action, doing justice to challenges
Formulates plausible hypothesis, plans and conducts experiments well
Defines terms in a way appropriate to the context
Draws conclusions when warranted, but with caution
Cross Modulation – An effect that affects receivers used for amplitude modulation or vestigial side band, or other forms of modulation where there is an amplitude component. Cross modulation traditionally occurred in receivers receiving an AM signal in the presence of other strong AM signals. It was found that the modulation from the strong signal was cross modulated and appeared on the weaker signal being received. Effectively, cross modulation is the transfer of modulation from one signal, typically a much stronger one, to another signal, typically a weaker one. AM broadcast receivers -This is traditionally the area where cross modulation effects had been noticed. When listing to weaker AM broadcast signals in the presence of very strong off channel signals, the modulation of the stronger signal or signals was transposed onto the weaker wanted signal. When broadcast receivers were located close to a broadcast transmitter, it could become an annoying problem.
Cryptozoology – A field of research of mostly amateurs involving the search for animals whose existence has not been proven. The animals cryptozoologists study are often referred to as cryptids, a term coined by John Wall in 1983. This includes looking for living examples of animals that are considered extinct, such as non-avian dinosaurs; animals whose existence lacks physical evidence but which appear in myths, legends, or are reported, such as Bigfoot and Chupacabra, and wild animals dramatically outside their normal geographic ranges, such as African big cats.
Cynic – A person who believes that only selfishness motivates human actions and who disbelieves in or minimizes selfless acts or disinterested points of view. They express a bitter or sneering attitude.
Cynical – Being concerned only with one’s own interests and typically disregards accepted or appropriate standards in order to achieve them. It is being contemptuous (scornful) and mocking.
Dark Adaptation– The adjustment of the eye to low light intensities, involving reflex dilation of the pupil and activation of the rod cells in preference to the cone cells. Rhodopsin, a biological pigment in the photoreceptors of the retina, immediately photobleaches in response to light. Rods are more sensitive to light and so take longer to fully adapt to the change in light. Rods, whose photopigments regenerate more slowly, do not reach their maximum sensitivity for about half an hour. Cones take approximately 9–10 minutes to adapt to the dark.
Data – Facts and statistics collected together for reference or analysis; individual facts, statistics, or items of information for an assessment.
Decline Effect – The notion that psychics lose their powers under continued investigation. This idea is based on the observation that subjects who do significantly better than chance in early trials tend to do worse in later trials. The term was first described by parapsychologist Joseph Banks Rhine in the 1930s to describe the disappearing of extrasensory perception (ESP) of psychic experiments conducted by Rhine over the course of study or time. The term was once again used in a 2010 article by Jonah Lehrer published in The New Yorker.
Deductive Reasoning – a basic form of valid reasoning. Deductive reasoning, or deduction, starts out with a general statement, or hypothesis, and examines the possibilities to reach a specific, logical conclusion, according to California State University. The scientific method uses deduction to test hypotheses and theories.Dependent Variable – A variable that an experimenter predicts will be affected by manipulation of the independent variable.
Depth of Field – The range of distance that appears acceptably sharp. It varies depending on camera type, aperture and focusing distance, although print size and viewing distance can also influence our perception of depth of field. The depth of field does not abruptly change from sharp to unsharp, but instead occurs as a gradual transition. In fact, everything immediately in front of or in back of the focusing distance begins to lose sharpness — even if this is not perceived by our eyes or by the resolution of the camera.
Delusions – Mistaken beliefs maintained in spite of strong evidence to the contrary.
Demon – A demon is a supernatural and often malevolent being prevalent historically in religion, occultism, literature, fiction, mythology, and folklore; as well as in media such as comics, videogames, movies and television series. The original Greek word daimon does not carry negative connotations. Demon –
Dismissive – Resulting from or showing lack of knowledge or intelligence.
Divination – The practice of seeking knowledge of the future or the unknown by supernatural means. The attempt to foretell the future or discover occult knowledge by interpreting omens or by using paranormal or supernatural powers.
Double Blind Study – An experiment in which neither the participants nor the individuals running the study know which participants are in the control group and which are in the experimental group until after the results are tallied.
Egocentric Thinking – Seeing the world from only your own point of view; the inability to take another person’s perspective.
Electrical Noise – Any unwanted electrical signals that may be picked up from other equipment that is unintentionally radiating (transmitting) them, or the unwanted signals can be generated within the equipment by less than perfect components. The term “noise” is used because the effect is similar to how audio noise prevents you from clearly hearing a sound or music you are trying to hear. Electrical noise is any kind of electrical energy that you do not want. For example, if you tune your radio to a place between two broadcasting stations, you may hear some static or bleed through from nearby stations.
Electromagnetic Spectrum – Abbreviated as EM, and also called spectrum or electromagnetic radiation spectrum, electromagnetic spectrum refers to the complete range of wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation. The electromagnetic spectrum includes the following different types of radiation (from lowest energy to highest): radio, microwaves, infrared, visible, ultraviolet, X-rays and gamma-rays.
Empirical – Relying on or derived from observation, experimentation, or measurement.
Energy – Energy is the ability to bring about change or to do work. Energy exists in many forms, such as heat, light, chemical energy, and electrical energy. Thermodynamics is the study of energy.
Evidence – The available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid, that which tends to prove or disprove something.
EXIF – Stands for “exchangeable image file format”. It allows you to store certain information within your photographs. This information is known as “metadata” and can include things like the date and time the shot was taken, camera settings like shutter speed and focal length, and copyright information. This can be immensely useful when you’re reviewing your pictures. For example, you might notice that a shot of a runner has turned out a bit blurry, so you can examine the metadata to check your shutter speed, aperture, ISO speed and so on, and decide how you could do things differently in future.
Expectation – A strong belief that something will happen or be the case in the future. An expectant mental attitude. The act or state of looking forward or anticipating.
Experience – The involvement in something over time: active involvement in an activity or exposure to events or people over a period of time that leads to an increase in knowledge or skill. Knowledge or skill acquired: knowledge or skill gained through being involved in or exposed to something over a period of time.
Experiment – A scientific procedure undertaken to make a discovery, test a hypothesis, or demonstrate a known fact.
Experimenter Effect – An influence exerted by the experimenter’s expectations or other characteristics on the results of an experiment, especially in psychology. An effect on subjects due to the actions or presence of an experimenter.
Extrasensory Perception(ESP) – Perceptual, or “psychic”, abilities that supposedly go beyond the normal senses, including telepathy, clairvoyance, precognition, and psychokinesis.
Fact – A truth known by actual experience or observation; something known to be true. A thing that is indisputably the case; something that has actual existence; a piece of information presented as having objective reality.
Factoid – Unreliable information: something that may not be true but is widely accepted as true because it is repeatedly quoted, especially in the media.
Fake – Something that is not genuine, it is a forgery or sham, counterfeit. Something that is prepared or made in order to deceive.
False Analogy (Logical Fallacy) – The fallacy of incorrectly comparing one thing to another in order to draw a false conclusion.
False Cause (Logical Fallacy) – You presumed that a real or perceived relationship between things means that one is the cause of the other. Many people confuse correlation (things happening together or in sequence) for causation (that one thing actually causes the other to happen). Sometimes correlation is coincidental, or it may be attributable to a common cause.
Film grain (or granularity) – This is random optical texture of processed photographic film due to the presence of small particles of a metallic silver, or dye clouds, developed from silver halide that have received enough photons. While film grain is a function of such particles (or dye clouds) it is not the same thing as such. It is an optical effect, the magnitude of which (amount of grain) depends on both the film stock and the definition at which it is observed. It can be objectionably noticeable in an over-enlarged photographic film photograph.
Forer Effect (Barnum Effect) – The Forer effect refers to the tendency of people to rate sets of statements as highly accurate for them personally even though the statements could apply to many people. Psychologist Bertram R. Forer (1914-2000) found that people tend to accept vague and general personality descriptions as uniquely applicable to themselves without realizing that the same description could be applied to just about anyone.
Fraud – Wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain; a person or thing intended to deceive others, typically by unjustifiably claiming or being credited with accomplishments or qualities; deceit, trickery, sharp practice, or breach of confidence, perpetrated for profit or to gain some unfair or dishonest advantage.
Frequency – The number of complete oscillations per second of energy (as sound or electromagnetic radiation) in the form of waves. Frequency describes the number of waves that pass a fixed place in a given amount of time. So if the time it takes for a wave to pass is 1/2 second, the frequency is 2 per second. If it takes 1/100 of an hour, the frequency is 100 per hour. Usually frequency is measured in the hertz unit, named in honor of the 19th-century German physicist Heinrich Rudolf Hertz.
Fundamental Attribution Error – also known as correspondence bias or overattribution effect, is the tendency for people to over-emphasize dispositional, or personality-based explanations for behaviors observed in others while under-emphasizing situational explanations
Gambler’s Fallacy – also known as the Monte Carlo fallacy or the fallacy of the maturity of chances, is the mistaken belief that if something happens more frequently than normal during a given period, it will happen less frequently in the future (or vice versa). In situations where the outcome being observed is truly random and consists of independent trials of a random process, this belief is false. The fallacy can arise in many situations, but is most strongly associated with gambling, where it is common among players. The term “Monte Carlo fallacy” originates from the best known example of the phenomenon, which occurred in the Monte Carlo Casino in 1913.
Gauss – (symbolized by G) is the centimeter-gram-second (cgs) unit of magnetic flux density. A flux density of 1 G represents one Maxwell per centimeter squared (1 Mx cm-2). The guass was named for the German scientist Karl Friedrich Gauss. The gauss is used when expressing the flux density produced by magnets of the sort commonly encountered in consumer products. The flux density of the earth’s magnetic field at the surface is about 1 G. In industrial electromagnetics, the tesla (T), a much larger unit, is used to express magnetic flux density. The gauss is equal to one ten-thousandth of a tesla.
Genetic Fallacy (Logical Fallacy) – Judging something as either good or bad on the basis of where it comes from, or from whom it came. This fallacy avoids the argument by shifting focus onto something’s or someone’s origins. It’s similar to an ad hominem fallacy in that it leverages existing negative perceptions to make someone’s argument look bad, without actually presenting a case for why the argument itself lacks merit.
Ghost – In folklore, a ghost is the soul or spirit of a dead person or animal that can appear to the living. In ghostlore, descriptions of ghosts vary widely from an invisible presence to translucent or barely visible wispy shapes, to realistic, lifelike forms.
Groupthink – In close-knit groups, the tendency for all members to think alike for the sake of harmony and to suppress disagreement. The practice of thinking or making decisions as a group in a way that discourages creativity or individual responsibility. A psychological phenomenon that occurs within a group of people, in which the desire for harmony or conformity in the group results in an irrational or dysfunctional decision-making outcome. Faulty decision making that occurs when a highly cohesive group strives for agreement and avoids inconsistent information.
Half Truth (Logical Fallacy) – the fallacy of telling the truth but deliberately omitting important key details in order to falsify the larger picture and support a false conclusion.
Hallucination – An experience involving the apparent perception of something not present. A perception of something (as a visual image or a sound) with no external cause usually arising from a disorder of the nervous system (as in delirium tremens or in functional psychosis without known neurological disease) or in response to drugs; perceiving things in the absence of stimulation; perceiving things that are not really there. A hallucination can be false or distorted, but seem very real and vivid to the person experiencing it. Hallucinations can involve any of the senses including vision, hearing, smell, touch, taste and movement. There are a number of different things that may cause hallucinations including substance abuse and schizophrenia.
Hate Group – An organized group or movement that advocates and practices hatred, hostility, or violence towards members of a race, ethnicity, religion, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation or any other designated sector of society. According to the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), a hate group’s “primary purpose is to promote animosity, hostility, and malice against persons belonging to a race, religion, disability, sexual orientation, or ethnicity/national origin which differs from that of the members of the organization.” The Southern Poverty Law Center’s (SPLC) definition of a “hate group” includes those having beliefs or practices that attack or malign an entire class of people, typically for their immutable characteristics.
Hertz – The measurement, abbreviated Hz, is the number of waves that pass by per second. For example, an “A” note on a violin string vibrates at about 440 Hz (440 vibrations per second).
Hindsight Bias – The tendency to overestimate one’s ability to have predicted an event once the outcome is known. Also known as the knew-it-all-along effect or creeping determinism, it is the inclination, after an event has occurred, to see the event as having been predictable, despite there having been little or no objective basis for predicting it, prior to its occurrence.
Hoax – Something intended to deceive or defraud. A trick into believing or accepting as genuine something false and often preposterous. They are done deliberately, and not from a mistake or accident.
Hot Reading – A technique used when giving a psychic reading in stage magic performances, or in other contexts. In hot reading, the reader uses information about the person receiving the reading (for example, from background research or overhearing a conversation) which the receiver is not aware that the reader already knows. Hot reading is commonly used in conjunction with cold reading (where no previously gathered information is used) and can explain how a psychic reader can get a specific claimed “hit” of accurate information.
Hypothesis – An educated guess, based on observation. Usually, a hypothesis can be supported or refuted through experimentation or more observation. A hypothesis is a propostion, or set of propositions, set forth as an explanation for the occurrence of some specified group of phenomena, either as a provisional conjecture to guide investigation (working hypothesis) or accepted as highly probable in the light of established facts. These reasoned explanations are not guesses — of the wild or educated variety. When scientists formulate new hypotheses, they are usually based on prior experience, scientific background knowledge, preliminary observations, and logic.
Ideology – a set of opinions or beliefs of a group or an individual. Very often ideology refers to a set of political beliefs or a set of ideas that characterize a particular culture.
Ideomotor Effect – Refers to the influence of suggestion or expectation on involuntary and unconscious motor behavior. The movement of pointers on Ouija boards, of a facilitator’s hands in facilitated communication, of hands and arms in applied kinesiology, and of some behaviors attributed to hypnotic suggestion, are due to ideomotor action. The term “ideomotor action” was coined by William B. Carpenter in 1852 in his explanation for the movements of rods and pendulums by dowsers, and some table turning or lifting by spirit mediums (the ones that weren’t accomplished by cheating). Scientific tests by American psychologist William James, French chemist Michel Chevreul, English scientist Michael Faraday (Zusne and Jones 1989: 111), and American psychologist Ray Hyman have demonstrated that many phenomena attributed to spiritual or paranormal forces, or to mysterious “energies,” are actually due to ideomotor action. Furthermore, these tests demonstrate that “honest, intelligent people can unconsciously engage in muscular activity that is consistent with their expectations” (Hyman 1999). They also show suggestions that guide behavior can be given by subtle cues (Hyman 1977).
Ignorance (Ignorant) – Lacking knowledge or awareness in general; uneducated or unsophisticated; lacking knowledge, information, or awareness about something in particular; resulting from or showing lack of knowledge or intelligence.
Illusory Correlation – An illusory correlation occurs when a person perceives a relationship between two variables that are not in fact correlated.
Image Noise -is random variation of brightness or color information in images and is usually an aspect of electronic noise. It can be produced by the sensor and circuitry of a scanner or digital camera. Image noise can also originate in film grain and in the unavoidable shot noise of an ideal photon detector. Image noise is an undesirable by-product of image capture that obscures the desired information.
Implicit Learning – Learning that occurs when you acquire knowledge about something without being aware of how you did so and without being able to state exactly what it is you have learned.
Imply – To express something in an indirect way without saying it plainly. The speaker implies.
Independent Variable – A variable that an experimenter manipulates.
Inductive Reasoning – is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning makes broad generalizations from specific observations. Basically, there is data, then conclusions are drawn from the data.
Infer – To form an opinion based on evidence and reasoning; the listener infers.
Informational Social Influence – Conforming to group pressure out of a need for direction or information.
Infrared (of Electromagnetic Radiation) – Having a wavelength just greater than that of the red end of the visible light spectrum but less than that of microwaves. Infrared radiation has a wavelength from about 800 nm to 1 mm, and is emitted particularly by heated objects.
Interpretation – The act or result of explaining or interpreting something; the way something is explained or understood.
Investigate – To carry out a systematic or formal inquiry to discover and examine the facts of an incident, allegation, claim, etc. so as to establish the truth; carry out research or study into a subject, typically one in the scientific or academic field, so as to discover facts or information; to examine, study or inquire into systematically; search or examine into the particulars of; examine in detail.
Investigation – The act or process of investigating (see “Investigate”) or the condition of being investigated. A searching inquiry for ascertaining facts; detailed or careful examination.
Investigator – A person who investigates (see “Investigate”). A person who carries out a formal inquiry or investigation. A person whose job is to examine a crime, problem, statement, claim, etc. in order to discover the truth.
Ion – An ion is a charged atom or molecule. It is charged because the number of electrons do not equal the number of protons in the atom or molecule. An atom can acquire a positive charge or a negative charge depending on whether the number of electrons in an atom is greater or less then the number of protons in the atom.
Ionizing Radiation – Ionizing radiation is radiation with enough energy so that during an interaction with an atom, it can remove tightly bound electrons from the orbit of an atom, causing the atom to become charged or ionized. Ionizing radiation takes a few forms: Alpha, beta, and neutron particles, and gamma and X-rays.
ISO – Short for International Standards Organization, and sometimes referred to by its former name “ASA,” ISO is a numerical representation of the imaging devices’ sensitivity to light. In traditional (film) photography ISO (or ASA) was the indication of how sensitive a film was to light. It was measured in numbers (you’ve probably seen them on films – 100, 200, 400, 800 etc.). The lower the number the lower the sensitivity of the film and the finer the grain in the shots you’re taking. In Digital Photography ISO measures the sensitivity of the image sensor. The same principles apply as in film photography – the lower the number the less sensitive your camera is to light and the finer the grain. Higher ISO settings are generally used in darker situations to get faster shutter speeds. For example, an indoor sports event when you want to freeze the action in lower light. However the higher the ISO you choose, the “noisier” shots you will get.
Knowledge – known information; general awareness or possession of information, facts, ideas, truths, or principles; specific information; clear awareness or explicit information
Law of Conservation of Energy – The first law of thermodynamics which states that the total amount of energy in a system remains constant (“is conserved”), although energy within the system can be changed from one form to another or transferred from one object to another. Energy cannot be created or destroyed, but it can be transformed. This is really what we mean when we say we are “using” energy. The law of conservation of energy means that when energy is being used, it is not being used up. Instead, it is being changed from one form into another. A car engine burns fuel, converting the fuel’s chemical energy into mechanical energy to make the car move. Windmills change the wind’s energy into mechanical energy to turn turbines, which then produce electricity. Solar cells change sunlight (radiant energy) into electrical energy.
Lens Flare – An anomaly created when non-image forming light enters the lens and subsequently hits the camera’s film or digital sensor. This often appears as a characteristic polygonal shape, with sides which depend on the shape of the lens diaphragm. It can lower the overall contrast of a photograph significantly and is often an undesired artifact, however some types of flare may actually enhance the artistic meaning of a photo. Flare can take many forms, and this may include just one or all of the polygonal shapes, bright streaks, or overall washed out look (veiling flare).
Light Adaptation – The reflex adaptation of the eye to bright light, consisting of an increase in the number of functioning cones, accompanied by a decrease in the number of functioning rods (opposed to dark adaptation); the adjustment of the eye under increased illumination, in which the sensitivity to light is reduced; the process for light adaptation occurs over a period of five minutes.
Light painting– (painting with light,light drawing, or light art performance photography) is a term that describes photographic techniques of moving a light source while taking a long exposure photograph, either to illuminate a subject or space, or to shine light at the camera to ‘draw’, or by moving the camera itself during exposure of light sources. Practiced since the 1880s, the technique is used for both scientific and artistic purposes, as well as in commercial photography.
Literally – In a literal or strict sense, i.e. something that really happened, without exaggeration or inaccuracy. Often misused adverb.
Loaded Question (Logical Fallacy) – One asks a question that has a presumption built into it so that it couldn’t be answered without implication. Loaded question fallacies are particularly effective at derailing rational debates because of their inflammatory nature – the recipient of the loaded question is compelled to defend himself and may appear flustered.
Logic – A proper or reasonable way of thinking about or understanding something. It is the study of the principles of correct reasoning, the main principle of which is whether certain conclusions follow from some given assumptions.
Logical Fallacy – A flaw in the structure of a deductive argument which renders the argument invalid. Logic is the use of valid reasoning; a fallacy is an argument that uses poor reasoning.
Long Exposure – Long-exposure photography, or time-exposure photography, involves using a long-duration shutter speed to sharply capture the stationary elements of images while blurring, smearing, or obscuring the moving elements. The paths of moving light sources become clearly visible.
Magical Thinking – Believing that one event happens as a result of another without a plausible link of causation; belief that merely thinking about an event in the external world can cause it to occur. It may be part of ideas of reference, considered normal in those instances, or may reach delusional proportions when the individual maintains a firm conviction about the belief, despite evidence to the contrary. The erroneous belief, similar to a normal stage of childhood development—Piaget’s pre-operational phase—that thoughts assume a magical power capable of influencing events without a physical action actually occurring; a conviction that thinking equates with doing, accompanied by an unrealistic understanding of cause and effect.
Matrixing – An electronic method of processing quadraphonic sound for recording in a two-channel form, for re-conversion to four channels when played back.
Medium – The intervening substance through which impressions are conveyed to the senses or a force acts on objects at a distance. A person supposedly used as a spiritual intermediary between the dead and the living.
Methodology – the systematic, theoretical analysis of the methods applied to a field of study. It comprises the theoretical analysis of the body of methods and principles associated with a branch of knowledge.
MilliGauss (mG) – One milliGauss is 1/1000 of a Gauss (see Gauss). This is a common measurement found on electromagnetic field meters.
Misinformation Effect – Incorporation of incorrect information (misinformation) into our memory of an eyewitness event. The result is an altered memory of the event. Human memory is just not as good as people think it is. Misinformation can also creep in by how a question is phrased.
Motion Blur – Apparent streaking of rapidly moving objects in a still image or a sequence of images such as a movie or animation. It results when the image being recorded changes during the recording of a single frame, either due to rapid movement or long exposure.
Moving the Goalposts (Logical Fallacy) – Demanding an opponent to address more and more points after the initial counter-argument has been satisfied, refusing to conceded or accept the opponent’s argument; previously agreed upon standards for deciding an argument are arbitrarily changed once they have been met. This is usually done by the “losing” side of an argument in a desperate bid to save face. If the goalposts are moved far enough, then the standards can eventually evolve into something that cannot be met no matter what (or anything will meet said standard if the losing side is trying to meet the standard using this tactic). Also known as: gravity game, raising the bar, argument by demanding impossible perfection.
Narcissistic – A personality disorder. One of several types of personality disorders, is a mental condition in which people have an inflated sense of their own importance, a deep need for excessive attention and admiration, troubled relationships, and a lack of empathy for others.
No True Scotsman (Logical Fallacy) – One makes what could be called an Appeal to Purity as a way to dismiss relevant criticisms or flaws of your argument. In this form of faulty reasoning, one’s belief is rendered unfalsifiable because no matter how compelling the evidence is, one simply shifts the goalposts so that it wouldn’t apply to a supposedly ‘true example’. This kind of post-rationalization is a way of avoiding valid criticism of one’s argument.
Non-Ionizing Radiation – is described as a series of energy waves composed of oscillating electric and magnetic fields traveling at the speed of light. Non-ionizing radiation includes the spectrum of ultraviolet (UV), visible light, infrared (IR), microwave (MW), radio frequency (RF), and extremely low frequency (ELF).
Null Hypothesis – A type of hypothesis used in statistics that proposes no statistical significance exists in a set of given observations. The null hypothesis attempts to show that no variation exists between variables, or that a single variable is no different than zero. It is presumed to be true until statistical evidence nullifies it for an alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis assumes that any kind of difference or significance you see in a set of data is due to chance. Scientific hypothesis must show evidence sufficient to reject the null hypothesis.
Objective – Not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts.
Observation – The active acquisition of information from a primary source. In living beings, observation employs the senses. In science, observation can also involve the recording of data via the use of instruments. The term may also refer to any data collected during the scientific activity.
Occam’s Razor – A scientific and philosophic rule that entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily which can be interpreted as requiring that the simplest of competing theories be preferred to the more complex, or that explanations of unknown phenomena be sought first in terms of known quantities.
Open-Minded – A willingness to try new things or to hear and consider new ideas; to be receptive to arguments or ideas. Willing to consider new ideas; unprejudiced.
Operational Definition – A precise definition of a term in a hypothesis, which specifies the operations for observing and measuring the process or phenomenon being defined; a belief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty.
Opinion – A personal view; the view somebody takes about an issue, especially when it is based solely on personal judgment.
Patent – an exclusive right granted for an invention, which is a product or a process that provides, in general, a new way of doing something, or offers a new technical solution to a problem. To get a patent, technical information about the invention must be disclosed to the public in a patent application.
Patternicity -The tendency to find meaningful patterns in both meaningful and meaningless noise.
Paranormal – Coined in 1920, it meant “beside, above or beyond normal”. By 1970, the term was expanded to include all mysterious phenomenon, including ghosts, UFOs, monsters, psychic powers, strange disappearances and claims that appear to be not of normal explanation.
Parapsychological Association, The – is an international professional organization of scientists and scholars engaged in the study of psi (or ‘psychic’) experiences, such as telepathy, clairvoyance, psychokinesis, psychic healing, and precognition. The primary objective of the PA is to achieve a scientific understanding of these experiences. First established in 1957, the PA has been an affiliated organization of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) since 1969. The PA is a non-profit, non-adjudicating organization that endorses no ideologies or beliefs other than the value of rigorous scientific and scholarly inquiry.
Parapsychology – The study of purported psychic phenomenon such as ESP and mental telepathy.
Parasomnias – Refers to all the abnormal things that can happen to people while they sleep, apart from sleep apnea. Examples include sleep-related eating disorder, sleepwalking, nightmares, sleep paralysis, REM sleep behavior disorder, and sleep aggression. Parasomnias can occur as a person is falling asleep or at any point in the sleep cycle. If they occur while falling asleep, a person may experience disturbing hallucinations or sleep paralysis, which is when the body is unable to move for seconds or minutes. Sleep paralysis can be quite frightening, especially when it occurs with hallucinations. Parasomnias that occur during sleep, such as REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD), often involve vigorous and harmful dream-enacting behaviors.
Pareidolia – A type of illusion or misperception involving a vague or obscure stimulus being perceived as something clear and distinct. It often involves a sound or image being perceived as something significant. (Synonymous with “Matrixing”, a term coined by certain ghost hunters but has a distinctly different definition, see “matrixing”.)
Peer Review – Peer review is the evaluation of work by one or more people of similar competence to the producers of the work. It constitutes a form of self-regulation by qualified members of a profession within the relevant field. Peer review is the evaluation of creative work or performance by other people in the same field in order to maintain or enhance the quality of the work or performance in that field. It is based on the concept that a larger and more diverse group of people will usually find more weaknesses and errors in a work or performance and will be able to make a more impartial evaluation of it than will just the person or group responsible for creating the work or performance. Peer review is a crucial phase of scientific work.
Perception – The process by which the brain organizes and interprets sensory information. A reaction to a placebo manifested by a lessening of symptoms or the production of anticipated side effects.
Personal Incredulity (Logical Fallacy) – Results when a person finds something difficult to understand, or are unaware of how it works, and so assumes that it is probably not true. Complex subjects like biological evolution through natural selection requires some amount of understanding before one is able to make an informed judgment about the subject at hand; this fallacy can be used in place of that understanding.
Phrenology – A now discredited theory that different brain areas account for a specific character and personality traits, which can be “read” from the bumps on the skull.
Placebo – An inactive substance or fake treatment used as a control in an experiment. A placebo is anything that seems to be a “real” medical treatment — but isn’t. It could be a pill, a shot, or some other type of “fake” treatment. What all placebos have in common is that they do not contain an active substance meant to affect health.
Placebo Effect – Any effect that seems to be a consequence of administering a placebo; the change is usually beneficial and is assumed result from the person’s faith in the treatment or preconceptions about what the experimental drug was supposed to do; pharmacologists were the first to talk about placebo effects but now the idea has been generalized to many situations having nothing to do with drugs. The effect includes all the unrecognized bias within the study, not just the effect due to the placebo itself.
Plausible – Seemingly or apparently valid, likely, or acceptable; apparently reasonable, truthful. It does not mean that something is definitely valid or truthful, just that it could be.
Post Hoc Argument (Logical Fallacy) – The classic fallacy that because something comes at the same time or just after something else, the first thing is caused by the second.
Priming – An acuteness to stimuli because of previous exposure to a certain event or experience. For example, an individual who purchases a new car may now start to notice with more frequency, other people driving the same make and model. This person has been primed to recognize more readily a car like their own because of the experience they have driving and owning one.
Premise – A proposition upon which an argument is based or from which a conclusion is formed – it’s the foundation you build your argument on. In order for an argument to be sound, all of its premises must be true.
Preternatural – That which appears outside or beside the natural; beyond what is normal or natural; existing outside of nature; apparently inexplicable by natural means.
Probability – The extent to which something is probable; the likelihood of something happening or being the case; the chance that a given event will occur.
Professional – A person engaged in a specified activity as one’s main paid occupation rather than as a pastime; a person engaged or qualified in a profession; a person formally certified by a professional body or belonging to a specific profession by virtue of having completed a required course of studies and/or practice and whose competence can usually be measured against an established set of standards; a person who has achieved an acclaimed level of proficiency in a calling or trade.
Proof – Evidence that establishes existence or truth (or non-existence or untruth) of a fact to the satisfaction of an authority (such as a court) or according to the accepted standards. Scientific proof is based on empirical evidence.
Psychic – Relating to or denoting faculties or phenomena that are apparently inexplicable by natural laws, especially involving telepathy or clairvoyance; a person appearing or considered to have powers of telepathy or clairvoyance.
Puberty – The period during which adolescents reach sexual maturity and become capable of reproduction; the condition of being or the period of becoming first capable of reproducing sexually marked by maturing of the genital organs, development of secondary sex characteristics, and in the human and in higher primates by the first occurrence of menstruation in the female.
Quantum Physics – The study of the behavior of matter and energy at the molecular, atomic, nuclear, and even smaller microscopic levels. In the early 20th century, it was discovered that the laws that govern macroscopic objects do not function the same in such small realms.
Random – made, done, happening, or chosen without method or conscious decision. Governed by or involving equal chances for each item.
Random Number Generator (RNG) – A random number generator (RNG) is a mathematical construct, either computational or as a hardware device, that is designed to generate a random set of numbers that should not display any distinguishable patterns in their appearance or generation, hence the word random.
Red Herring (Logical Fallacy) – An irrelevant distraction, attempting to mislead an audience by bringing up an unrelated, but usually emotionally loaded issue.
Reflection – The throwing back by a body or surface of light, heat, or sound without absorbing it
Refute – Prove a statement or theory to be wrong or false, disprove; to prove wrong by argument or evidence, show to be false or erroneous; to deny the truth or accuracy of.
Refraction – The change of direction of a ray of light, sound, heat, or the like, in passing obliquely from one medium into another in which its wave velocity is different.
Regulate – To control or supervise (something, especially a company or business activity) by means of rules and regulations; to adjust so as to ensure accuracy of operation.
Research – The systematic investigation into and study of materials and sources in order to establish facts and reach new conclusions; careful study that is done to find and report new knowledge about something
Retinal – Light-sensitive inner surface of the back of the eye, which contains the receptive cells for vision (cones and rods).
Rods – Receptor cells in the retina that detect shades of gray, are responsible for peripheral vision, and are most sensitive in dim light.
Rolling shutter – is a method of image capture in which a still picture (in a still camera) or each frame of a video (in a video camera) is captured not by taking a snapshot of the entire scene at a single instant in time but rather by scanning across the scene rapidly, either vertically or horizontally.
Science – The intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment; the community of those who use this method to procure knowledge; the body of reliable knowledge derived about a certain topic in nature.
Scientifical – Attempting to be scientific but falling short of achieving credible research; use of science-like jargon and imagery to make yourself sound intelligent to a lay audience when you have no idea what you are talking about.
Scientific Method – A method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement and experiment, and the formation, testing, and modification of hypotheses. There is no “cookbook” scientific method but best practices vary for each scientific field.
Selective Thinking – The process whereby one selects favorable evidence for remembrance and focus, while ignoring unfavorable evidence for a belief; the process by which one focuses on favorable evidence in order to justify a belief, ignoring unfavorable evidence. (See also Confirmation Bias)
Self-Proclaimed – Described as or proclaimed to be such by oneself, without endorsement by others; giving yourself a particular name, title, etc. usually without any reason or proof that would cause other people to agree with the proclamation.
Self-Serving Bias – Taking credit for our successes and
externalizing our failures.
Shutter – A curtain in front of the camera sensor that stays closed until the camera fires. When the camera fires, the shutter opens and fully exposes the camera sensor to the light that passes through the lens aperture. After the sensor is done collecting the light, the shutter closes immediately, stopping the light from hitting the sensor. The button that fires the camera is also called “shutter” or “shutter button”, because it triggers the shutter to open and close.
Shutter Speed (Exposure Time) – The amount of time that the shutter is open. Shutter speed is measured in seconds – or in most cases fractions of seconds. The bigger the denominator, the faster the speed (i.e., 1/1000 is much faster than 1/30). Shutter speed, also known as “exposure time”, represents the length of time a camera shutter is open to expose light into the camera sensor. If the shutter speed is fast, it can help to freeze action completely. If the shutter speed is slow, it can create an effect called “motion blur”, where moving objects appear blurred along the direction of the motion.
Skeptic – A person who questions the validity or authenticity of something purporting to be factual, such as a claim or statement. A modern participant in the “skeptic” community seeks conclusions solely on the basis of the best evidence derived for a claim.
Skepticism – The process of applying reason and critical thinking to determine validity – finding a supported conclusion, not the justification of a preconceived conclusion. Skepticism is not a position; it’s a process. Expression of being not easily convinced, having doubts or reservations; practice of doubting or having a questioning attitude or state of mind; a methodology based on an assumption of doubt with the aim of acquiring approximate or relative certainty.
Sleep Paralysis – A feeling of being conscious but unable to move. It occurs when a person passes between stages of wakefulness and sleep. During these transitions, you may be unable to move or speak for a few seconds up to a few minutes. Some people may also feel pressure or a sense of choking. A frightening form of paralysis that occurs when a person suddenly finds himself or herself unable to move for a few minutes, most often upon falling asleep or waking up. Sleep paralysis is due to an irregularity in passing between the stages of sleep and wakefulness. The symptoms of sleep paralysis include sensations of noises, smells, levitation, paralysis, terror, and images of frightening intruders. Once considered very rare, up to half of all people are now believed to experience sleep paralysis sometime during their life. Sleep paralysis is not considered to be a sign of a serious condition, although it can be frightening. Sleep paralysis occurs as a person is moving into or out of REM (rapid eye movement) sleep, the deepest part of sleep. During REM sleep, the body is largely disconnected from the brain, effectively leaving the body paralyzed. Sleep paralysis is the result of premature (or persistent) mind-body disconnection as one is about to enter into (or exit from) REM sleep.
Slippery Slope (Logical Fallacy) – States that if we allow “A” to happen, then “Z” will eventually happen too, therefore “A” should not be allowed to happen. The problem with this reasoning is that it avoids engaging with the issue at hand, and instead shifts attention to extreme hypotheticals. Because no proof is presented to show that such extreme hypotheticals will in fact occur, this fallacy has the form of an Appeal to Emotion fallacy by leveraging fear. In effect the argument at hand is unfairly tainted by unsubstantiated conjecture.
Special Pleading (Logical Fallacy) – To “move the goalposts” or made up an exception when a personal claim was shown to be false. Humans have an aversion to being wrong. Rather than appreciate the benefits of being able to change one’s mind through better understanding, many will invent ways to cling to old beliefs. One of the most common ways that people do this is to post-rationalize a reason why what they thought to be true must remain to be true.
Spotlight Effect – A term used by social psychologists to refer to the tendency to overestimate how much other people notice about us: our appearance, our behavior, and in particular for those with social anxiety disorder (SAD), our social faux pas. It is named the spotlight effect, because you operate as though a spotlight is shining on you and believe others are paying more attention to you than they actually are.
Statistical Significance – A result that is not likely to occur randomly, but rather is likely to be attributed to a specific cause. Statistical significance can be strong or weak, and is important to scientific research including in medicine, sociology, psychology and biology. Statistical significance does not always indicate practical significance. In addition, it can be misinterpreted when researchers do not use language carefully in reporting their results.
Strawman (Logical Fallacy) – Misrepresenting someone’s argument to make it easier to attack. By exaggerating, misrepresenting or just completely fabricating someone’s argument, it’s much easier to present your own position as being reasonable, but this kind of dishonesty serves to undermine honest rational debate.
Subjective – Based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes or opinions. Relating to the way a person experiences things in his or her own mind.
Subjective Validation – Refers to a process by which people accept some claim or phenomenon as valid based solely upon a few personal experiences and/or subjective perception.
Subliminal – Pertaining to any stimulus presented below the threshold of conscious awareness.
Supernatural – A manifestation or event attributed to some force beyond scientific understanding or the laws of nature; of or relating to an order of existence beyond the visible observable universe; manifestations or events considered to be of supernatural origin, such as ghosts.
Theory (Scientific Theory) – Summarizes a hypothesis or group of hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing; an accepted hypothesis. A theory is valid as long as there is no evidence to dispute it. Therefore, theories can be disproven. If evidence accumulates in support of a hypothesis, then the hypothesis will become accepted as a good explanation of a phenomenon. They are concise (i.e., generally don’t have a long list of exceptions and special rules), coherent, systematic, predictive, and broadly applicable. *”It’s just a theory” – Occasionally, scientific ideas are written off with the putdown “it’s just a theory”. This slur is misleading and conflates two separate meanings of the word theory: in common usage, the word theory means just a hunch, but in science, a theory is a powerful explanation for a broad set of observations, a model of how the world works.
Thermodynamics – The branch of physical science that deals with the relations between heat and other forms of energy (such as mechanical, electrical, or chemical energy), and, by extension, of the relationships between all forms of energy.
Trademark – (also written trade mark or trade-mark) is a type of intellectual property consisting of a recognizable sign, design, or expression which identifies products or services of a particular source from those of others, although trademarks used to identify services are usually called service marks.
Triboelectric Effect – (also known as Triboelectric charging) is a type of contact electrification on which certain materials become electrically charged after they are separated from a different material with which they were in contact. Rubbing the two materials each with the other increases the contact between their surfaces, and hence the triboelectric effect. Johan Carl Wilcke published the first triboelectric series in a 1757 paper on static charges.
True-Believer Syndrome – An expression coined by M. Lamar Keene to describe an apparent cognitive disorder characterized by believing in the reality of paranormal or supernatural events after one has been presented overwhelming evidence that the event was fraudulently staged.
Trust – Belief that someone or something is reliable, good, honest, effective, etc.
UFO – An unidentified flying object. In its most general definition, any apparent anomaly in the sky that is not identifiable as a known object or phenomenon. Such anomalies may later be identified, but depending on the evidence or lack of evidence, such an identification may not be possible generally leaving the anomaly unexplained. The term “UFO” (or “UFOB”) was officially created in 1953 by the United States Air Force (USAF) to serve as a catch-all for all such reports. It was stated that a “UFOB” was “any airborne object which by performance, aerodynamic characteristics, or unusual features, does not conform to any presently known aircraft or missile type, or which cannot be positively identified as a familiar object.” As originally defined, the term was restricted to those fraction of cases which remained unidentified after investigation, with USAF interest being for potential national security reasons and/or “technical aspects.” (See Air Force Regulation 200-2.) During the late 1940s and through the 1950s, UFOs were often referred to popularly as “flying saucers” or “flying discs”. The term UFO became more widespread during the 1950s, at first in technical literature, but later in popular use. UFOs garnered considerable interest during the Cold War, an era associated with a heightened concern for national security. The term today is often associated with a conclusion that the anomaly is an alien spacecraft.
Ultraviolet – Pertaining to a band of electromagnetic radiation having wavelengths (from c. 5 to c. 400 nanometers) that are shorter than violet light.
Understanding – A mental grasp; comprehension. The power of comprehending, especially the capacity to apprehend general relations of particulars; the power to make experience intelligible by applying concepts and categories.
Validate – Check or prove the validity or accuracy of (something).
Validity Effect – The tendency of people to believe that a statement is true or valid simply because it has been repeated many times.
Variable – An element, feature, or factor that is liable to vary or change.
White noise – A type of noise that is produced by combining sounds of all different frequencies together; all of the imaginable tones that a human can hear combined together. The adjective “white” is used to describe this type of noise because of the way white light works. White light is light that is made up of all of the different colors (frequencies) of light combined together (a prism or a rainbow separates white light back into its component colors). In the same way, white noise is a combination of all of the different frequencies of sound. Because white noise contains all frequencies, it is frequently used to mask other sounds.
If you’re interested in paranormal topics, I’m sure you’ve probably seen the viral video that claims to be from a Wingate Hotel located somewhere in Illinois, and features a plain-clothed security guard checking on an empty room from which blood-curdling screams are coming from. When the security guy goes in, a transparent ‘ghost’ floats out of the room and down the hallway. In addition, the voice of another security guard, allegedly communicating through two-way radios, claims that John (our security guy) reports all the furniture in the room is upside down, the carpet is ripped up, and the shower is on – all from a room that is unoccupied. The video most frequently shared on social media is 3:01 long and seems to have convinced many that it is authentic proof of a ghost. (1) We’re going to take a closer look at the video, as well as the person behind its creation.
Let’s break down the video first – In the opening text, we
are told of the video that “It has not been edited”. Honestly, that should be
your first red flag. Over the years of analyzing hundreds of such videos, it’s
been my experience that when they feel the need to state upfront that they
haven’t edited it, it’s usually been edited. And… they’re usually faking it
(No, it’s not science, that comes from experience). The ominous soundtrack that
was added immediately destroys the whole “not edited” disclaimer. Another hit
to the claim is the video itself. In speaking with an employee at a
manufacturer of these types of systems, I was told “This video has been
edited at least to insert the quad views intermixed with the single views.
Security recorders do not work this way by themselves. They record the
individual video streams and you pull off the video that you need to look at
later. The quad views are strictly for display at the monitor point. In large
systems, you can have many more than four displayed on a screen at one
time.”
I have several issues with the audio track. In the video’s
YouTube description, it states “The audio is a mix down between the security
camera audio and a separate recording from inside the office”. According to
this statement, we have two audio tracks that were edited together…once again
destroying the claim that the video was not edited. In addition, we have no
idea what audio may have been edited out of the final product. As John (the guy
seen in the video) is walking down the hall, the screams are heard for the
first time. When asked “What’s going on John?”, John’s response is
unintelligible…both times he spoke into his microphone – strange that one can
hear screams from inside the room, behind a closed door, and picked up by the
security camera…but John’s voice could not. John is using a two-way radio that
requires him to key the microphone (push the button) in order to talk.
As we watch John make his way to room 209 from the
elevators, there was something odd going on that, at first, I couldn’t quite
pinpoint. After reviewing it again to update this piece, it finally dawned on
me; there are no other guests around. According to the video’s description,
“people staying at the hotel began calling in noise complaints to the
front desk with reports of loud screaming coming from the 2nd
floor–particularly room #209”. With the type of screaming we’re led to
believe is coming from this room, and guests allegedly calling the front
desk…one would expect to see concerned guests in the hallway, knocking on the
door. But when looking at the cameras…we see no one but John.
A very important piece of information was brought to my
attention after I originally posted this piece. Hotel security cameras do not
record audio, it’s illegal for them to do so. Cameras are allowed in guest room
hallways, but they only record video – no audio tracks. This alone refutes the
statement that “The audio is a mix down between the security camera audio
and a separate recording from inside the office.” There simply is no audio
track from the security camera.
The main voice (the guy the in the security office) is
having a conversation with Amy, the female voice we heard at the beginning of
the video, she reports the screaming in coming from room 209. The main voice
guy clarifies her as Amy within the first minute of the video. Yet, about forty
seconds later when main-voice guy asks “Amy, are you there?”, we
don’t hear her anymore. Even when the main voice asks “but we’re sure that no
one’s checked into that room…correct?” there is no audible response from Amy.
This is odd since according to the statement in the description, the audio is
being recorded in the security office and should have picked up Amy’s side of
the conversation (like it did at the beginning of the video).
Main voice guy then tells John “I would wait for the
police…JOHN”. John fails to respond at all, and in fact, goes about opening the
door and going in despite being specifically told to wait for the police. We
see no reaction from John whatsoever to being told to wait for the police. Oh,
and suddenly, without any additional conversation with John, the main voice guy
changes his mind completely and tells Amy that “John’s gonna enter the room
real quick just to check…make sure…see what’s going on…”. There is either a
severe lack of communication with the hotel…or this audio track has large gaps
missing. Continue reading.
It’s important to point out that at timestamp 1:16, there is
a skip in the video – John’s body and most notably his left foot skip position.
This could be a glitch in the video or a point where they edited the footage.
I’m leaning towards an edit.
John goes into the room, shining his flashlight around the
room. Once John is all the way in and out of sight, a low-budget Paranormal
Activity-style ghost walks out of the room and down the hall (we’ll talk about
this a little later on). While John is still out of sight of the security
camera…the lamp on the wall in the hallway flickers. My first question among
all this chaos is – why didn’t John turn the light on in the room? My second
question is; why don’t we see the other camera views of this event? At the
beginning of the video, as we follow John to room 209, we see that there are
two other cameras – Camera 7 and Camera 22. Camera 7 is just at the next set of
guest rooms…looking at the exact area the “ghost” walks towards.
Camera 22 is down by the elevators and also faces down the same hallway. Why
don’t we see the video feeds from those cameras? (Because it’s a hoax and would
have taken much more work).
The “ghost” is most likely from a simple effect of
overlaying two video clips taken from the same, stationary camera. Video
footage of a guy in a sheet, walking out of the room and down the hallway, is
overlayed onto the current video. When the two are merged like this, all the
objects that appear in both look normal. However, objects that only appear in
one video will look transparent. I’ve done this myself a few times, and I
learned the technique from little kids (who made YouTube tutorials on it!). On
a side note, I find it odd (and funny) that the “ghost” takes off down the hall
to the right and out of sight, but the lamp to the left of the room flickers.
On we go… Main voice guy then asks “John, are you
there?”…and three seconds later John comes out of the room (and still hasn’t
turn the lights on) and is looking back into the room, shining his flashlight
into it. Main voice guy suddenly says “OK Amy, John wants you to call the
police right now if you don’t mind”. We do not see, nor do we hear, any
communication between John and main voice guy that relays that information.
What is going on with the audio? (it’s edited, that’s what’s going on). Main
voice guy is then telling Amy (who still is silent) that John says “Uh, he says
no one’s in there, that all the furniture’s been turned upside down…and
the….hold on…He says the carpet’s been ripped up and the…that the shower is
on…”. The problem is that we still don’t hear anything coming from John, not
from the security camera that supposedly had audio (it didn’t) or the recording
from the office. Also, at timestamp 1:53, we see John raise the microphone to
his mouth and speak – yet we STILL hear nothing from either audio recordings.
Do you need any more evidence that this video has been edited? Some of you do,
so I’ll keep going.
We never see any images or video of the alleged chaos
reported in the room. You would think that something like this would cause someone
to take a picture. Since this is the security footage, I also have to wonder
why the footage from when the police showed up isn’t included. Main-voice guy
tells Amy to call the police, and the room is allegedly trashed, all after
hearing screams coming from a room with no people in it. Are we to believe no
one called the police to make a report? No one took pictures of the trashed
room? Well, yes…we are supposed to believe that. It’s a hoax, after all. One
more point here, there is also no verification that this hotel is a Wingate
hotel…or if it’s even in Illinois.
With all of the issues I had with the video, and so many
people sharing it on Facebook (with many tagging me), my OCD kicked in and I
decided to spend a few hours and see what I could find out about it. Let’s take
a look.
The video was originally posted to YouTube on September 4,
2012, by the username Jimmynut22. What I find interesting from the start is
that the video was uploaded under three different titles; “Ghost screaming
in haunted hotel – FULL LENGT”[sic], “Scary ghost caught on tape by
security camera | Real ghost on tape | Scary ghost videos 2013” (Both
posted Sept. 4, 2012), and “Alien caught on camera” (September 5,
2012 – 63,330 views). He also has another video up, under two different names,
yet posted the same day; “Alien Caught on Video – 1988” and
“2013 – Ghost walks by Camera in BASEMENT”. (2)
Take a look at the ghost/alien…notice any similarities
between this “ghost” and the one in the hotel video? It sure looks like the same
effect to me; overlaying two video clips from the same stationary camera. I
noticed something else in this other video – the opening text states “I was
recently hired to transfer a series of video tapes for archival purposes by the
state”. This statement sent up another red flag for me, one that made me think
this guy is probably a professional video guy. Hmmm, the plot thickens.
While updating this piece, I once again took a peek at his
YouTube profile. I found that he’s uploaded three more videos, two of which
from a month ago and are clips from a “documentary” entitled
“The Blackwell Ghost” (which is available on Amazon Prime). This
seems to be a Paranormal Activity-style video from what I could tell by the
trailer. However, it’s the third additional video that interests me. It was
posted three years ago and is entitled “GHOST hiding in the
basement–(CAUGHT on VIDEO)–SCARY” (6). Spoiler alert, it’s not scary. It
does have an audio track that takes you back to the hotel video we’re discussing
here. The recorded audio is an alleged 911 call by the owner describing
“someone in his house”. The 911 operator sounds a bit like the
main-voice guy in the hotel video. Ironically, at the end of the video, we get
advertisements for his other video, The Blackwell Ghost.
After subscribing to his YouTube profile, I checked out what
he was up to. I found a post in which he reveals himself – “Hey! My name is
Turner Clay and I made the movie State of Emergency.” (3). I went on to a
Google search that brings me to an IMDb page with has a listing for Turner
Clay. According to the site, Turner wrote and directed the movie State of
Emergency. However, it doesn’t end there. Turner is credited as editor,
producer, director, writer and visual effects on three movies (State of
Emergency, Interception, Disaster L.A.) and editor for two shorts (Silent
Night, Employee of the Month{also producer on this}). He’s also given credit
for Sound Editor, Post Sound Mix, Camera Operator, Actor and Digital Effects on
these and other films. (4) Turner also has a Production Reel for himself,
showcasing his work. At the end of the video, he lists the services offered.
These include Editing, Visual Effects, Sound Design, Location Sound Recording,
and others.
So, we have a mysterious video, which no one can verify
where it took place, released eleven years after it supposedly happened, and
posted by a guy that not only writes and directs/produces movies, but has
digital effects and sound editing experience/credits.
My opinion of this video is that it’s a hoax. A scripted and
poorly created one, at that. It reminds me of the plethora of crappy
“ghost” videos that infest YouTube. Perhaps it’s a deleted scene from
one of Turner Clay’s shorts or a film school project. I originally posted this
piece on October 1, 2013, and it still gets hits on social media. The video on
YouTube has almost eleven million views and over eight thousand comments. I’m
sure those numbers will continue to grow, despite the overwhelming evidence
that it was fabricated.
Information is an important key to any investigation, and
there is hardly any to go on with this video. We don’t even know where it was
filmed! It’s interesting to note an “update” that was posted to the
video description; “**UPDATE: Due to legal matters, I am not allowed to
say any more information regarding the exact location of this hotel. Please
stop asking. Thank you!” One has to wonder if Mr. Clay got in some trouble
for having acquired hotel security footage that he wasn’t privy to. All in all,
this appears to be nothing more than a film-makers side hobby, making cheesy
videos that some people still suck up as “proof”.
2017 UPDATE;
While doing some additional research for other projects, I
came across a video by YouTube user ‘LordanARTS’ that focused on the “Screaming
Hotel Ghost” video (7). Along with the coolness of him referencing my
breakdown, he was able to dig a little deeper and uncover, what I believe, is
the last clue we need to determine this is a complete hoax.
In his research, LordanARTS discovered a rare photography of
Turner Clay (8)(pictured below), and compared it to ‘John’, the alleged
security guard that is sent to the room to investigate the disturbances. Lordan
focuses on the shot of security guard John as he comes off the elevator, and we
see a pretty damn good resemblance; the same style ball cap with what appears
to be the ‘Built Ford Tough’ logo and the same striped lanyard around his neck.
Although the resolution of the YouTube video is not the
best, it’s not hard to recognize the young man in the video as Turner Clay
himself. As I looked closer at the video footage, it appears these were most
likely his very own video cameras set up on tripods, and not the hotel
surveillance video.
March 2018 Update
In 2018 I wrote an article for CSI about the film The
Blackwell Ghost, which is promoted as an “authentic documentary”
about a filmmaker/journalist that sets out to prove ghosts are real (the link
to that article in the references below). I became aware of this film while
researching an update on an older YouTube video called “Ghost screaming in
haunted hotel”. It seems that the guy that produced the YouTube video,
Turner Clay, is the same guy that produced and stars in The Blackwell Ghost.
I think I did a pretty good deconstruction of the Ghost
Screaming in Haunted Hotel” video back in 2013 (and updated in 2017). The
one thing that had nagged at me over the years was the hotel in which the video
was filmed. According to the video description, it was filmed at “a
WINGATE HOTEL in Illinois”. When I originally wrote my analysis, I spent a
fair amount of time searching images of all the Wingate hotels in the state of
Illinois. After several nights, I failed to locate the hotel. I was left with a
few conclusions; the hotel may have been remodeled since the video was made,
the hotel wasn’t actually in Illinois, or perhaps the hotel isn’t even a
Wingate. I eventually accepted that I was most likely never going to find it.
Fast forward five years – I just finished my review of The
Blackwell Ghost, thoroughly explaining much of the alleged “evidence”
presented. With tiny details and some in-depth investigating, I was able to
locate the mysterious house from the film. (Hint, it’s not in Pennsylvania like
the film claims). In the course of researching this film, I uncovered a lot of
information about the filmmaker that I hadn’t been aware of before. One golden
nugget of information was that Clay and his brother were working for Toby
Keith’s “Live in Overdrive tour” in 2012.
This is significant because the “Ghost screaming in
Haunted Hotel” (GSHH) video was published on YouTube September 4, 2012
(Tuesday). When I looked further into Clay’s work with the tour, I was able to
find the original, uncropped photograph of Clay that I used to compare with the
GSHH video. As it turns out, the original image is of Clay, his wife, his
brother, and Toby Keith. This gave me the idea to check the tour schedule and
see if there were any dates scheduled in Illinois. There was! I
thought…maybe…I might finally be able to find the mysterious hotel!
On September 2, 2012 (Sunday) – two days before the video
was posted – the tour stopped at the First Midwest Bank Amphitheatre, in Tinley
Park, Illinois. I searched for a Wingate hotel in the area and sure enough, one
popped up. I was excited but soon felt the let down…the front entrance and
indoor pool didn’t match up with the GSHH video. I decided to take a long shot,
and do a Google search for “indoor pool and hot tub Illinois”. After
looking at a few hundred images, I came across two that gave me hope once
again. One image was from a Comfort Inn & Suites and the other was a
Baymont Inn & Suites. Both of the pools were very similar to what I was
looking for.
And then it struck me – the front entrance and pool images
that appear in the split-screen view of the video…was a decoy. They were
probably from another hotel. But…what about the interior? What about the
hallway and elevator scenes? I grabbed some screenshots and compared the
stylized signs at the elevator and at each room and confirmed they were Wingate
signs.
Ok, so they were actually from a Wingate. Next, I did a
search of the nearby hotels and what the pools looked like. It didn’t take long
– about five hundred feet away, the La Quinta hotel displayed images of their
pool area that matched what I was looking for…exactly! The doors, light
fixtures, and positions, signs, used towel containers…all of it. I found a
perfect match. I checked the entrance and once again found a perfect match –
doors, huge concrete vase, trimmed bushes, windows, etc.
Another quick scene seals the deal; at timestamp 1:12 the
video is showing the split-screen view again, showing views of the hallway,
pool, stairway, and front entrance. As with surveillance systems that monitor
multiple cameras, the front entrance view switches to the hotel gym area. It’s
on screen for less than a second, but it’s enough to pause and grab a screen
capture of it. I looked up the gym at the La Quinta where I found the pool and
entrance…and it’s also an exact match! Same three pieces of equipment
(treadmill, cycle machine, and stepper), flat screen TV hung by the mirror,
window, warning sign, and A/C unit.
In conclusion, Mr. Clay was probably staying at the Wingate
hotel while working for the Live in Overdrive tour. I say this because the
interior shots of the hotel show him entering a guest room, so he had a key. At
some point, he got the idea to make a “ghost” video but didn’t want
people to be able to find the hotel he filmed at. With that in mind, he walked
over (or drove) to the La Quinta and filmed areas – front entrance, pool, and
gym – that would not appear in any Wingate hotel, thus hiding where he was. He
merged the videos to look like security footage, added his very bad
“ghost”, and uploaded it to viral video fame. Then he used it as the
first part of his Blackwell Ghost film, which is also a hoax.
2019 Final Update
In the summer of 2018, I was on my way to Louisville, KY and stopped by Lexington so I could see the house used in the pseudo-documentary film, The Blackwell Ghost; the one that is allegedly in Pennsylvania. The house is in Lexington, and belongs to Turner Clay, creator of the film and our hotel video. I had located the house in my investigation into the film, so I stopped by to get a selfie – yes, I really did. At the encouragement of a friend (former journalist), I knocked on the door; no answer. I wrote a note and as I squeezed it into his screen door, Clay opening it and came out.
After introducing myself, he recognized my name and had read my article on his film. We had a great conversation and when asked, he quickly admitted it was all him; the “screaming ghost in the hotel” video and The Blackwell Ghost film. He created it all for entertainment. As we spoke, he explained that he never expected the video or film to take off like they did. It basically got away from him, and he became concerned about the backlash he might receive if he publicly admitted they were fake.
And that’s the end of this investigation. I finally got in touch – in person – with the primary source and confirmed this video was a hoax.